Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Ripha International University
2 Department of Physiology, Islamic International Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
3 Medical Education, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan
4 Department of Anatomy, Army Medical College, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A teacher’s appropriate use of nonverbal communication skills, mainly kinesics, can
play a crucial role in the success of the students. Medical educators are unaware of the effective use
of nonverbal communication as an instructional skill that can be used to engage learners, balance
learners’ participation by controlling the classroom environment, and motivate them to have a passion
for learning. The purpose of the study was to explore the students’ perceptions regarding the effect
of teachers’ kinesics on students’ learning and their learning environment. This can be helpful for
teachers in modifying their teaching styles and delivering quality education.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A qualitative study with an exploratory design was conducted at a
private medical institute in 2021 for a duration of 6 months. Fourteen medical students volunteered
to participate in the study. Focus group discussions were conducted with the students to explore the
experiences of the medical students regarding the use of nonverbal communication skills by their
teachers and its effect on their learning in the classroom. The data collected was analyzed manually.
RESULTS: The results of the study revealed that teachers’ nonverbal behaviors in the classroom
significantly influence students’ motivation, engagement, and learning in the classroom. Students
preferred interaction with the teachers who were friendly and confident and used their nonverbal
communication skills (eye contact, facial expressions, hand gestures) effectively, compared to strict
and judgmental teachers.
CONCLUSION: Teachers need to motivate their students by improving their teaching styles and
incorporating nonverbal behaviors positively in the classroom. By creating an impactful learning
environment, students’ participation and learning will increase, which will, in turn, improve their
academic performance.
Keywords
for effective body language for medical educators. Med Teach
2017;39:914–9.
2. Bunglowala AAA, Bunglowala AAA. Non verbal communication:
An integral part of teachinglearning process. Int J Res Advent
Technol 2015;1:371–5.
3. Irungu M. Learner‑teacher non‑verbal interaction effect on
academic achievement of learners in chemistry. African Educ
Res J 2019;7:88–96.
4. Silva P, Almeida N. The teacher’s body elements that influence the
teaching‑learning process of university nursing students. Invest
Educ Enferm 2017;35:268–75.
5. Keutchafo ELW, Kerr J, Jarvis MA. Evidence of nonverbal
communication between nurses and older adults : A scoping
review BMC Nurs 2020;19:53.
6. Fredericks B, Alexander G. A framework for improved classroom
communication in the South African schooling context. Heliyon
2021;7:e06382.
7. Bambaeeroo F, Shokrpour N. The impact of the teachers’
non‑verbal communication on success in teaching. J Adv Med
Educ Prof 2017;5:51–9.
8. Ahmad SS, Zani R. Impact of kinesics on students’ learning
satisfaction. Elixir Mgmt Arts 2012;48:9672–5.
9. Fabrigas YC, Maniago JD. Kinesics as a science teaching strategy
for indigenous learners. Int J Contemp Res Rev 2018. doi:
10.15520/ijcrr/2018/9/01/409.
10. Wahyuni A. The Power of Verbal and Nonverbal Communication
in Learning. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on
Intellectuals’ Global Responsibility (ICIGR 2017). Paris, France:
Atlantis Press; 2018.
11. da Silva PS, de Figueiredo NMA. The teacher’s body elements
that influence the teaching‑learning process of university nursing
students. Investig Educ Enferm 2017;35:268–75.
12. Demir‑Yildiz C, Tatik RS. Impact of flexible and non‑flexible
classroom environments on learning of undergraduate students.
Eur J Educ Res 2019;8:1159–73.
13. Piza F, Piza P, Schwartzstein RM. The power of nonverbal
communication in medical education. Med Teach 2019;41:476–7.
14. Alaagib NA, Musa OA, Saeed AM. Comparison of the
effectiveness of lectures based on problems and traditional
lectures in physiology teaching in Sudan. BMC Med Educ
2019;19:365.
15. Alireza S. Investigation of the effect of communicational
empowerment pattern on nursing student’s communicational
competency. J Educ Health Promot 2019;8:264.
16. Kirima TM, Kinyua SM. Teacher related factors influencing
students ’ enrollment in Biology subject in public secondary
schools in Meru central Sub County in Kenya. J Educ Pract
2016;7:130–6.
17. Froneman K, Du Plessis E, Koen MP. Effective educator–student relationships in nursing education to strengthen nursing students’
resilience. Curationis 2016;39:1595.
18. Al‑Mohaimeed AA. Comparison between faculty and students
perspectives on the qualities of a good medical teacher:
A cross‑sectional study. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 2018;12:15–20.
19. Young S, Shaw DG. Profiles of effective college and university
teachers. J Higher Educ 1999;70:670–86.
20. Rueckert L, Church RB, Avila A, Trejo T. Gesture enhances
learning of a complex statistical concept. Cogn Res Princ Implic
2017;2:2
21. Cook SW, Duffy RG, Fenn KM. Consolidation and transfer of
learning after observing hand gesture. Child Dev 2013;84:1863–71.
)