Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- Taghread Ahmed Elsayed Ahmed 1
- . Heba Ali Ibrahim Seleem
- . Ghada Mohamed Youssef Elsayed.
- . Nour Taha Ebrahem Housen
- . Naglaa Mohamed Roby Sofy 2
- . Sara Nashat Housny Elshltawy 3
1 Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
2 Department of Kindergarten, College of Education, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, KSA
3 Department of Curriculum and Teaching Methods of Physical Education, Mansoura University, Egypt
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Online learning is the newest and most popular form of distance education today;
within the past decade it has had a major impact on education. The aim of the present study was to
know the effect of online learning basketball using social media on learners’ performance of some
fundamental skills in basketball and determine difference between online learning and in‑person
learning, knowing which one is better than the other.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present experimental study was conducted in Sports Academy
for Basketball in Zagazig‑Egypt during March–April 2022. Thirty two female junior basketball players
volunteered to participate in the study from Sports Academy for Basketball (age: 16.23 ± 0.66 years;
body height: 164.5 ± 3.32 cm; body mass: 65.25 ± 3.22 kg). They were divided into two equally sized
experimental groups, online learning (ONL) group (n = 16) and in‑person learning (INL) group (n = 16),
to perform (15) educational sessions for (5) weeks, (3) sessions per week, and the session time
was 90 minutes. Junior basketball players were assessed before and after five‑week training period.
Data were collected by Basketball Passing test, Dribbling Skill test, Lay Up Shoot test, Speed Spot
Shooting, and Free‑Throw Shooting test. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 22
software using the descriptive statistical test. The level of significance was set at P ≤0.05.
RESULTS: The results showed that the two groups made significant improvements in all variables but
INL group had significantly greater improvements than ONL group. The percentage of improvement
ranged from 13% to 223% for INL group versus 8% to 158% for ONL group.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that in‑person basketball learning was better than online learning
basketball. Therefore, teachers and trainers must rely primarily on in‑person learning and not rely
on distance learning, especially with regard to learning motor skills, except in emergency cases.
Keywords
- David JL, Powless MD, Hyman JE, Purnell DM, Steinfeldt JA,
Fisher S. College student athletes and social media: The
psychological impacts of Twitter use. Int J Sport Commun
2018;11:163‑86.
2. Smith SA, Watkins BA. Score! How collegiate athletic departments
are training student‑athletes about effective social media use.
J Public Relat Educ 2018;4:149‑79.
3. Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Higher education and the digital
revolution: About MOOC, SPOCs, social media, and the cookie
monster. Bus Horiz 2016;59:441‑50.
4. Robinson M. Athletic Identity: Invincible and Invisible, the
Personal Development of the Athlete. Design Publishing; 2017.
5. NadeakB. The Effectiveness of distance learning using social media
during the pandemic period of COVID‑19: A case in universitas
Kristen Indonesia. Int J Adv Sci Technol 2020;29:1764‑72.
6. Al‑Rahmi WM, Zeki AM. A model of using social media for
collaborative learning to enhance learners’ performance on
learning. J King Saud Univ 2017;29:526‑35. - 7. Ahmed TA, Elsayed GM, Housen NT, Ismail HA, Ahmed NA.
Specialized training according to basketball players’ position and
its effect on competitive behavior and tactical performance. Eur J
Mol Clin Med 2020;7:1515‑23.
8. Rahmadani A, Asmawi M, Hanif AS. Development the learning
model of basketball passing with playing approach on junior
high school students advances in social science. Educ Hum Res
2020;464:201‑4.
9. Matulaitis K, Skarbalius A, Abrantes C, Gonçalves B, Sampaio J.
Fitness technical, and kinanthropometrical profile of youth
Lithuanian basketball players aged 7–17 years old. Front Psychol
2019;10:1677.
10. Ogawa M, Hoshino S, Fujiwara M, Nakata H. Relationship
between basketball free‑throw accuracy and other performance
variables among collegiate female players. J Phys Fitness Sports
Med 2019;3:127‑36.
11. Basketball Drills for Coaches. Available from: https://www.
breakthroughbasketball.com/drills/basketballdrills.html. [Last
accessed on 2022 Apr 23].
12. Animated basketball drills. Available from: https://www.
jes‑basketball.com/animated/drills.html. [Last accessed on
2022 Apr 23].
13. Gels J, Animated Basketball Plays, Offenses and Defenses.
Available from: https://www.coachesclipboard.net/Animations.
html. [Last accessed on 2022 Apr 23].
14. 73 Basketball Drills for Players and Coaches. Available
from: https://www.basketballforcoaches.com/
basketball‑drills‑and‑games‑for‑kids. [Last accessed on
2022 Apr 23].
15. 22 Simple, Fun & Effective Basketball Drills. Available
from: https://www.online‑basketball‑drills.com/
basketball‑drills. [Last accessed on 2022 Apr 23].
16. Latha K, Meena KS, Pravitha MR, Dasgupta M, Chaturvedi SK.
Effective use of social media platforms for promotion of mental
health awareness. J Edu Health Promot 2020;9:124.
17. Kim KS, Sin SC. Use and evaluation of information from social
media in the academic context: Analysis of gap between students
and librarians. J Acad Lib 2016;42:174‑82.
18. Rosenberg JM, Terry CA, Bell J, Hiltz V, Russo TE. Design
guidelines for graduate program social media use. Tech Trends
2016;60:167‑75.
19. Lahiry S, Choudhury S, Chatterjee S, Hazra A. Impact of social
media on academic performance and interpersonal relation:
A cross-sectional study among students at a tertiary medical
center in East India. J Edu Health Promot 2019;8:73.
20. Kumar A, Kalal N, Rana N, Vyas H, Choudhary V, Rani R. Online
learning in nursing students: Satisfaction and barriers. J Edu
Health Promot 2021;10:411.
)