Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing Department Faculty of Nursing, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be) University, Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Eaching methods are the stimulation, guidance, direction, and encouragement
for learning and also the means to achieve the desired educational objectives.
AIM: This study aimed to assess peer learning (PL) versus conventional teaching (CT)
regarding antenatal assessment in terms of knowledge, skills, and satisfaction among nursing
students.
METHODS: This was a quasi‑experimental study conducted on 51 B.Sc.Nursing 3rd‑year students
who were selected by convenient sampling and randomly assigned to PL (n = 21) and CT (n = 30)
group. Sample characteristics pro forma, structured knowledge questionnaire, observational checklist,
and satisfaction rating scale wereused to collect data from nursing students through self‑report and
observational technique.
RESULTS: The study results revealed that the mean posttest knowledge score (19.1 ± 0.75) in PL
group was higher than that in CT group (17.0 ± 0.741) and the mean rank skill score of PL group (44.90)
was higher than that in the CT group (20.30). There was no significant difference (t = 1.08, P > 0.05)
in mean posttest knowledge score, whereas the significant difference was found in posttest skill
score (Z = 5.00, P ≤ 0.01) among nursing students. Most of the nursing students were satisfied
with the CT method. There was a mild positive correlation (r = 0.25) between knowledge and skills
regarding antenatal assessment among nursing students.
CONCLUSION: Based on the findings of the study, it can be concluded that both PL and CT groups
were found to be equally effective in improving knowledge and skills of nursing students regarding
antenatal assessment.

Keywords

1. Roser M, Ortiz‑Ospina E. Global Rise of Education. Our World in
Data; 31 August, 2016. Available from: https://ourworldindata.
org/global‑rise‑of‑education. [Last accessed on 2019 Jun 10].
2. Roser M, Nagdy M, Ortiz‑Ospina E. Quality of Education.
Our World in Data; 17 July, 2013. Available from: https://
ourworldindata.org/quality‑of‑education. [Last accessed on
2019 Jun 10].
3. Learning Style in India Present System Stages Types. Available from:
https://targetstudy.com/articles/education‑in‑india‑today.
html. [Last accessed on 2019 Jun 12].
4. Strengthening Clinical Skills Using Peer‑Student Validation
Article Nursing Center. Available from: https://
www.nursingcenter.com/jourmal. [Last accessed on
2019 Jun 13].
5. Devi B, Khandelwal B, Das M. Analysis of knowledge and attitude
regarding antenatal examination among nursing students in
Sikkim: A descriptive co‑relational study. Int J Reprod Contracept
Obstet Gynecol 2016;5:3871‑8.
6. Ahmad IM, Mohamed HE. The effect of peer learning vs.
traditional learning on knowledge and clinical performance of
critical care nursing students. J Educ Practice 2018;9:136‑43.
7. Hals et al. Effects of Peer Education on the Knowledge of Breast
Cancer and Practice of Breast self‑Examination among Mansoura
University Female Students, Egypt. Available from: https://
www.researchgate.net/publication/279023635.[Last accessed
on 2019 Jun 10].
8. Daud S, Chaudhry AM, Ali SK. Lecture based versus peer assisted
learning: Quasi‑experimental study to compare knowledge gain
of forth year medical students in community health and nutrition
course. Res Dev Med Educ 2016;5:62‑8.
9. El‑Sayed SH, Metwally FG, Abdeen MA. Effect of Peer Teaching
on the Performance of Undergraduate Nursing Students Enrolled
in Nursing Administration Course; 2013.
10. Essa RM, Al‑Battawi JI, Demerdash DA, Ahmed HA. Effect
of application of peer learning strategy on obstetric and
gynecological nursing students clinical performance. J Nurs Educ
Practice 2017;8:144.
11. Riaz I. Peer assisted versus expert assisted learning: A comparison
of effectiveness in terms of academic scores. J Coll Physicians Surg
Pak 2014;24:825‑9.