Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Michigan

2 Department of Human Sciences, Consumer Sciences Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

3 Department of Human Nutrition, Winthrop University, South Carolina, USA

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preliminary evidence indicates that subclinical cardiometabolic abnormalities are
present in apparently healthy nonobese young adults. Poor dietary habits may be a contributing factor.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the presence of cardiometabolic
abnormalities in apparently healthy college students and to assess the relationship between diet
quality and cardiometabolic risk factors.
METHODS: Cross‑sectional anthropometric, lipidemia, and glucose tolerance, blood pressure, and
dietary Healthy Eating Index (HEI) data were collected (April 2015). Participants were undergraduate
students. Ordinary least squares regression was used to examine associations between diet quality
and cardiometabolic risk factors.
RESULTS: Participants (n = 147) were primarily nonHispanic Caucasian between 18 and 22 years
and largely nonobese (95.0% of females, 85.1% of males). Total HEI score was 56.1 ± 16.1 for
females and 53.2 ± 15.0 for males. Mean biochemical and clinical outcomes fell within normal limits.
However, 71.0% of females and 80.9% of males met ≥1 or more metabolic syndrome criteria. HEI
was not related to health outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiometabolic abnormalities are present in a large proportion of apparently
healthy undergraduates which may place them at risk for future cardiometabolic complications. There
was no relationship between diet quality and cardiometabolic health.

Keywords

1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of
childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011‑2012. JAMA
2014;311:806‑14.
2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of
obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and
adolescents, 1999‑2010. JAMA 2012;307:483‑90.
3. American College Health Association. National College
Health Assessment II: Undergraduate Student Reference
Group Executive Summary Fall 2016. Hanover, MD: American
College Health Association; 2017.
4. O’Neill S, O’Driscoll L. Metabolic syndrome: A closer look at
the growing epidemic and its associated pathologies. Obes Rev
2015;16:1‑2.
5. Shea JL, King MT, Yi Y, Gulliver W, Sun G. Body fat percentage
is associated with cardiometabolic dysregulation in BMI‑defined normal weight subjects. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2012;22:741‑7.
6. De Larochellière E, Côté J, Gilbert G, Bibeau K, Ross MK,
Dion‑Roy V, et al. Visceral/epicardial adiposity in nonobese
and apparently healthy young adults: Association with the
cardiometabolic profile. Atherosclerosis 2014;234:23‑9.
7. Morrell JS, Byrd‑Bredbenner C, Quick V, Olfert M, Dent A,
Carey GB, et al. Metabolic syndrome: Comparison of prevalence
in young adults at 3 land‑grant universities. J Am Coll Health
2014;62:1‑9.
8. Dalleck LC, Kjelland EM. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome
and metabolic syndrome risk factors in college‑aged students. Am
J Health Promot 2012;27:37‑42.
9. Van Duyn MA, Pivonka E. Overview of the health benefits of
fruit and vegetable consumption for the dietetics professional:
Selected literature. J Am Diet Assoc 2000;100:1511‑21.
10. Rose AM, Williams RA, Rengers B, Kennel JA, Gunther C.
Determining attitudinal and behavioral factors concerning milk
and dairy intake and their association with calcium intake in
college students. Nutr Res Pract 2018;12:143‑8.
11. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Anthropometry Procedures Manual, 2007. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention; 2007.
12. Scott A, Reed D, Kubena K, McIntosh W. Evaluation of a group
administered 24‑hour recall method for dietary assessment. J Ext
2007;45.
13. Using the USDA Food Models for Estimating Portions, 2007.
US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service,
Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Food Surveys
Research Group; 2007.
14. Guenther PM, Kirkpatrick SI, Reedy J, Krebs‑Smith SM,
Buckman DW, Dodd KW, et al. The healthy eating index‑2010 is
a valid and reliable measure of diet quality according to the 2010
dietary guidelines for Americans. J Nutr 2014;144:399‑407.
15. Guenther PM, Casavale KO, Reedy J, Kirkpatrick SI, Hiza HA,
Kuczynski KJ, et al. Update of the healthy eating index: HEI‑2010.
J Acad Nutr Diet 2013;113:569‑80.
16. Basiotis P, Carlson A, Gerrior S, Juan W, Lino M. The Healthy
Eating Index: 1999‑2000. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Center
for Nutrition Policy and Promotion; CNPP‑12; 2002.
17. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI,
Donato KA, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: A joint
interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation
Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart,
Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World
Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and
International Association for the Study Of Obesity. Circulation
2009;120:1640‑5.
18. The Ohio State University Highlights of Fifteenth Day Enrollment
for the Spring Term; 2015. http://oesar.osu.edu/student_
enrollment.aspx.
19. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr., Collins KJ,
Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/
ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for
the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high
blood pressure in adults: Executive summary: A report of the
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association
task force on clinical practice guidelines. Hypertension
2018;71:1269‑324.
20. Morrell JS, Cook SB, Carey GB. Cardiovascular fitness, activity,
and metabolic syndrome among college men and women. Metab
Syndr Relat Disord 2013;11:370‑6.
21. Al Dhaheri AS, Mohamad MN, Jarrar AH, Ohuma EO, Ismail LC,
Al Meqbaali FT, et al. A cross‑sectional study of the prevalence of
metabolic syndrome among young female emirati adults. PLoS
One 2016;11:e0159378.
22. Martínez‑Torres J, Correa‑Bautista JE, González‑Ruíz K, Vivas A,
Triana‑Reina HR, Prieto‑Benavidez DH, et al. A cross‑sectional
study of the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and associated
factors in Colombian collegiate students: The FUPRECOL‑adults
study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14. pii: E233.
23. Fernandes J, Lofgren IE. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome
and individual criteria in college students. J Am Coll Health
2011;59:313‑21.
24. de Freitas RW Jr., de Araújo MF, Marinho NB, de Vasconcelos HC,
Lima AC, Pereira DC, et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome
and its individual components in Brazilian college students. J Clin
Nurs 2013;22:1291‑8.
25. Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 8th ed. US Department of
Health and Human Services and US Department of Agriculture;
2015‑2020.
26. Nicklas TA, O’Neil CE, Fulgoni VL 3rd. Diet quality is
inversely related to cardiovascular risk factors in adults. J Nutr
2012;142:2112‑8.
27. Pérez‑Martínez P, Mikhailidis DP, Athyros VG, Bullo M,
Couture P, Covas MI, et al. Lifestyle recommendations for
the prevention and management of metabolic syndrome: An
international panel recommendation. Nutr Rev 2017;75:307‑26.
28. Huang TT, Shimel A, Lee RE, DelanceyW, Strother ML. Metabolic
risks among college students: Prevalence and gender differences.
Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2007;5:365‑72.
29. Yahia N, Brown CA, SnyderE, Cumper S, LangolfA, Trayer C, et al.
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its individual components
among midwestern university students. J Community Health
2017;42:674‑87.
30. Topè AM, Rogers PF. Metabolic syndrome among students
attending a historically black college: Prevalence and gender
differences. Diabetol Metab Syndr 2013;5:2.
31. Fonseca VA. The metabolic syndrome, hyperlipidemia, and
insulin resistance. Clin Cornerstone 2005;7:61‑72.
32. Schulze MB. Metabolic health in normal‑weight and obese
individuals. Diabetologia 2019;62:558‑66.
33. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health Behavior and Health
Education Theory, Research, and Practice. 4th ed. San Francisco,
CA: Wiley & Sons; 2002.