Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- . Behshid Ghadrdoost
- . Parham Sadeghipour 1
- . Ahmad Amin
- . Hooman Bakhshandeh
- . Feridoun Noohi 1
- . Majid Maleki 1
- . Mohammad Mehdi Peighambari 1
- . Majid Haghjoo 2
- . Mohammad‑Javad Alemzade‑Ansari 3
- . Mohammad Sadeghvashveshady 3
- . Bahram Mohebbi 3
1 Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Cardiac Electrophysiology Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran,
3 Cardiovascular Intervention Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Cardio‑Oncology Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‑19) pandemic has prompted the further
virtualization of medical education. The satisfaction level of specific users such as cardiology residents
with virtual education can augment its quality; hence, the significance of a valid and reliable questionnaire
to obtain feedback is needed. This study aimed to design and measure validity and reliability of a
satisfaction questionnaire for virtual education of cardiology residents during COVID‑19 pandemic.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross‑sectional study, a self‑administered questionnaire
was developed by the faculty members of Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center.
Reliability was tested utilizing Cronbach’s alpha and intercorrelation which was tested using Pearson’s
correlation coefficient test (ICC). Factor analysis was done by the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin measure of
sampling adequacy and Bartlett’s sphericity test. The statistical analyses were performed with the
SPSS software version 22.
RESULTS: The face validity index was determined via an assessment of the relevance, clarity, and
simplicity of each item, and values >0.79 were accepted. The total Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was
calculated 0.93. Concerning test–retest reliability, the correlation between two rounds of evaluation
was >80 (P > 0.001) and ICC was 0.99 (P = 0.001). The content validity evaluation yielded an index of
0.95 and a ratio of 0.91. The principal component factor analysis, conducted to investigate construct
validity, generated four domains.
CONCLUSIONS: The study results confirmed the validity and reliability of the designed questionnaire
to evaluate the level of satisfaction of cardiology residents with virtual learning in COVID‑19 pandemic.
Keywords
learning during the coronavirus disease‑2019 crisis in Iran:
opportunity or challenge? Disaster Med Public Health
Prep. 2020;14 (3):e11‑e12. doi: 10.1017/dmp. 2020.142. PMID:
32375914; PMCID: PMC7264447.
2. Tabatabai S. COVID‑19 impact and virtual medical education.
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2020;8 (3):140‑143. doi: 10.30476/
jamp.2020.86070.1213. PMID: 32802908; PMCID: PMC7395196.
3. Abbaszadeh A. Nursing teacher’s perception of the challenges
of clinical education and solutions. J Qual Res Health Sci
2013;2;134‑45.
4. Johande J, Gbadamosi G. Predicting students’ satisfaction
through service quality in higher education. Int J Manage Educ
2013;11:107‑18.
5. Dufrene RL. An evaluation of a patient satisfaction survey:
Validity and reliability. Eval Program Plann 2000;23:293‑300.
6. Shakibazadeh E, Sabouri M, Mohebbi B, Tol A, Yaseri M. Validity
and reliability properties of the Persian version of perceived health
competence scale among patients with cardiovascular diseases.
J Edu Health Promot 2020;9:293.
7. Mohebbi B, Tol A, Shakibazadeh E, Yaseri M, Sabouri M,
Agide FD. Testing Psychometrics of Healthcare Empowerment
Questionnaires (HCEQ) among Iranian Reproductive Age
Women: Persian Version. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018 ;28 (3):341‑346.
doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v28i3.12. PMID: 29983534; PMCID: PMC6016357.
8. Stone AT, Bransford RJ, Lee MJ, Vilela MD, Bellabarba C,
Anderson PA, Agel J. Reliability of classification systems for
subaxial cervical injuries. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2010;1 (3):19‑26.
doi: 10.1055/s‑0030‑1267064. PMID: 22956924; PMCID:
PMC3427957.
9. SantosRO, Gorgulho BM, Castro MA, FisbergRM, Marchioni DM,
Baltar VT. Principal Component Analysis and Factor Analysis:
differences and similarities in Nutritional Epidemiology
application. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2019 ;22:e190041. doi:
10.1590/1980‑549720190041. PMID: 31365598.
10. Masaeli N, Omranifard V, Maracy MR, Kheirabadi GR, Khedri A.
Validity, reliability and factor analysis of Persian version of
schizophrenia quality of life scale. J Educ Health Promot.
2016;5:10. doi: 10.4103/2277‑9531.184547. PMID: 27512702;
PMCID: PMC4959255.
11. Fesharaki MG, Talebiyan D, Aghamiri Z, Mohammadian M.
Reliability and validity of Job Satisfaction Survey questionnaire
in military health care workers. Iran J Mil Med 2012;13:241‑6.
12. Taherdoost H. Validity and reliability of the research instrument;
How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research.
Int J Acad Res Manage 2016;5:28‑36.
13. Fesharaki MG. The study of factors involved in job satisfaction of
worker who works in Najmie subspecialty hospital in 2010‑2011.
Iran J Mil Med 2012;13:241‑6.
14. Sadeghi‑Gandomani H, Alavi NM, Afshar M. Psychometric
Testing of the Persian Version of the Conditions of Work
Effectiveness Questionnaire‑II (CWEQ‑II‑PV). J Educ Health
Promot. 2019 ;8:32. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_285_18. PMID:
30993125; PMCID: PMC6432808.
15. Barbera E, Clara M, Linder‑Vanberschot J. Factors influencing
student satisfaction and perceived learning in online courses.
Elearn Digit Media 2013;10:226‑35.
)