Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Career and Educational Training, Polytechnic University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
2 Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The academic environment is a challenge for dental students due to the multiple
sources of stress they face. For this reason, the present study analyzes the psychometric properties
of the Dental Environment Stress (DES) questionnaire. The secondary objective was to identify the
specific sources of stress perceived by dental students related to gender and years of study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross‑sectional study was conducted among dental
students (n = 340; Mage = 22.45) from the Romanian University of Medicine and Pharmacy in
October– December 2019. The factorial structure of the questionnaire was performed by means
of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and the multi group‑CFA. The convergent and divergent
validities were measured by associating DES with scales that measure depression, anxiety, and
tension/stress (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale‑21‑R), perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale‑14),
and life satisfaction (Satisfaction with Life Scale).
RESULTS: New measure obtained supported a five‑factor and thirty‑item structure, which is gender
invariant. All the factors within DES have a significant positive correlation with depression, anxiety,
tension/stress, and perceived stress and a negative correlation with life satisfaction. The Cronbach’s
α coefficients are acceptable (range: 0.67–0.89). The female students perceive aspects related to
performance, the relations with the faculty, clinical responsibilities, and personal life to be more
stressful than males. Senior students perceive more stressed aspects related to personal life, while
freshmen have higher scores on stress associated with clinical responsibilities.
CONCLUSIONS: The present results show that DES has psychometric properties which are adequate
for the assessment of dental stress in the case of Romanian students; nevertheless, it is necessary
to extend the use of DES to students attending other universities and to dental practitioners.
Keywords
and its association with academic performance among dental
undergraduate students in Fujian, China: A cross‑sectional online
questionnaire survey. BMC Med Educ 2020;20:181.
2. Srivastava R, Jyoti B, Pradhan D, Kumar M, Priyadarshi P.
Evaluating the stress and its association with stressors among
the dental undergraduate students of Kanpur city, India:
A cross‑sectional study. J Edu Health Promot 2020;9:56.
3. Halboub E, Alhajj MN, AlKhairat AM, Sahaqi AM, Quadri MF.
Perceived stress among undergraduate dental students in relation
to gender, clinical training and academic performance. Acta
Stomatol Croat 2018;52:37‑45.
4. Alhajj MN, Khader Y, Murad AH, Celebic A, Halboub E,
Márquez JR, et al. Perceived sources of stress amongst dental
students: A multicountry study. Eur J Dent Educ 2018;22:258‑71.
5. Sangiorgio JP, Araujo PM, Navarro CH, Zen IR, Da Costa SC,
Ribeiro PH, et al. Dental environment stress: Findings among
Lusophone dental students. Braz Res Pediatric Dent Integr Clinic
2016;16:411‑24.
6. Roşu S, Dumitrescu AL, Dănilă I, Zetu I. Self‑concept,
social physique anxiety, social comparison, shyness,
sociability and oral health in Romanian undergraduates.
Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2013;78:481‑5.
7. Garbee W., Zucker SB, Selby GR. Perceived sources of stress
among dental students. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;100: 853‑7.
8. Laktić M, Kuftinec K, Čelebić A, Kovačić I, Alhajj MN, Kiršić SP.
Psychometric properties of the Croatian language version of
the dental environment stress questionnaire on dental medicine
students. Acta Stomatol Croat 2017;51:188‑94.
9. Elani HW, Allison PJ, KumarRA, Mancini L, Lambrou A, Bedos C.
A systematic review of stress in dental students. J Dent Educ
2014;78:226‑42.
10. Fonseca‑Molina J, Torres‑Martínez PA, Barrios-Penna CA,
Calbacho‑ContrerasV, Aguirre‑Bustamante J P ,
Fernandez‑Sagredo M, et al. A longitudinal study on stress sources
perceived by Chilean dental students. Rev Fac Med 2018;66:69‑74.
11. Divaris K, Polychronopoulou A, Taoufik K, Katsaros C, Eliades T.
Stress and burnout in postgraduate dental education. Eur J Dent
Educ 2012;16:35‑42.
12. Cohen S, Williamson CM. Perceived stress in a probability sample
of the United States. In: Spacapam S, Oskamp S, editors. The Social
Psychology Oh Health: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social
Psychology. London: Sage; 1988.
13. Shi C, Guo Y, Ma H, Zhang M. Psychometric validation of the
14‑item perceived stress scale in Chinese medical residents. Curr
Psychol 2019;38:1428‑34.
14. Mardare I, Bratu I. Measuring stress – Methods and tools. Acta
Med Trans 2020;25:5‑7.
15. MadaanN, WundavalliL, SatapathyS. Technostress among medical
freshmen: An exploratory study. J Edu Health Promot 2020;9:178.
16. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety
Stress Scales. 2nd ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation; 1995.
17. Vignola RC, Tucci AM. Adaptation and validation of the
depression, anxiety and stress scale (DASS) to Brazilian
Portuguese. J Affect Disord 2014;155:104‑9.
18. Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction with
Life Scale. J Pers Assess 1985;49:71‑5.
19. Useche S, Serge A. The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS):
Psychometric properties and observed scores in University
students. Adv Soc Psychol 2016;1:16‑22.
20. Esnaola I, Benito M, Antonio‑Agirre I, Freeman J, Sarasa M.
Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS)
by country, gender and age. Psicothema 2017;29:596‑601.
21. KlineRB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling.
4th ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2016.
22. Finney SJ, DiStefano C. Non‑normal and categorical data in
structural equation modeling. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO,
editors. Structural Equation Modeling a Second Course. 2nd ed.
Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing; 2013.
23. Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP. Goodness‑of‑fit indexes in
confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychol
Bull 1988;103:391‑410.
24. Basudan S, Binanzan N, Alhassan A. Depression, anxiety and
stress in dental students. Int J Med Educ 2017;8:179‑86.
25. Preoteasa CT, Mircescu G, Buzea MC, Preoteasa E. Sources
of stress and well‑being in dental students. J Oral Rehabil
2015;7:28‑32.
26. JurkatH, Höfer S, RichterL, CramerM, VetterA. Quality of life, stress
management and health promotion in medical and dental students.
A comparative study. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2011;136:1245‑50.
27. Biber P, Hupfeld J, Meier LL. Personal values and relational
models. Eur J Pers 2008;22:609‑28.
28. Alzahem AM, van der Molen HT, de Boe, BJ. Effect of year of
study on stress levels in male undergraduate dental students.
Adv Med Educ Pract 2013;4:217‑22.
29. Mohebbi B, Tol A, Shakibazadeh E, Yaseri M, Sabouri M,
Agide FD. Testing psychometrics of Healthcare Empowerment
Questionnaires (HCEQ) among Iranian reproductive age women:
Persian version. Ethiop J Health Sci 2018;28:341‑6
)