Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

2 Cognitive Neuroscience Research Center for Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

3 Center for Educational Research in Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran,

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A doctor–patient relationship built on the concept of empathy is so essential to
attain the best clinical outcomes in medicine. Since empathy has a positive role in interpersonal
relationships and medical outcomes, its assessment is highly crucial. The aim of this study was to
assess the empathy in last‑year medical students using the Persian version of the Jefferson Scale
of Physician Empathy (JSPE) and correlate empathy scores with demographic features.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross‑sectional study, last‑year medical students at Shiraz
Medical School, Shiraz, Iran, were recruited for this study. In this research, we used the Persian
version of JSPE. The validity and reliability of the Persian version of this tool were confirmed in the
previous research. For the analysis of data, we employed descriptive statistics and the independent
sample t‑test.
RESULTS: One hundred and eighty‑five final‑year medical students were included in this study.
The maximum score of the questionnaire was 140, and the total mean score of empathy was
98.15 ± 13.29. The females’ total mean score (102.05 ± 11.89) was higher than the males’
score (93.57 ± 13.46). The difference between the mean score of gender and empathy was
significant (P value <.001), but there was no significant difference between empathy and the two
other demographic factors (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Although physicians would gain the essential characteristics of empathy during their
career, attending professors and other responsible policymakers in medical education should focus
more on the factors related to physicians’ empathy to train better and more professional physicians.

Keywords

  1. CharonR. The patient‑physician relationship. Narrative medicine:
    A model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA
    2001;286:1897‑902.
    2. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Vergare M, Magee M.
    Physician empathy: Definition, components, measurement,
    and relationship to gender and specialty. Am J Psychiatry
    2002;159:1563‑9.
    3. Bein T. Empathy: Some thoughtful reflections among a favorable
    attitude. Intensive Care Med 2017;43:1157‑8.
    4. Krishnasamy C, Ong SY, Loo ME, Thistlethwaite J. How does
    medical education affect empathy and compassion in medical
    students? A meta‑ethnography: BEME Guide No. 57. Med Teach
    2019;41:1220‑31.
    5. Shariat SV, Eshtad E, Ansari S. Empathy and its correlates
    in Iranian physicians: A preliminary psychometric study
    of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy. Med Teach
    2010;32:e417‑21.
    6. Abe K, Niwa M, Fujisaki K, Suzuki Y. Associations between
    emotional intelligence, empathy and personality in Japanese
    medical students. BMC Med Educ 2018;18:47.
    7. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Veloksi JJ, Magee M.
    The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: Further psychometric
    data and differences by gender and specialty at item level. Acad
    Med 2002;77:S58‑60.
    8. Sinclair S, Beamer K, Hack TF, McClement S, Raffin Bouchal S,
    Chochinov HM, et al. Sympathy, empathy, and compassion:
    A grounded theory study of palliative care patients’
    understandings, experiences, and preferences. Palliat Med
    2017;31:437‑47.
    9. Decety J, Fotopoulou A. Why empathy has a beneficial impact
    on others in medicine: Unifying theories. Front Behav Neurosci
    2014;8:457.
    10. Thirioux B, Birault F, Jaafari N. Empathy is a protective factor of
    burnout in physicians: New neuro‑phenomenological hypotheses
    regarding empathy and sympathy in care relationship. Front
    Psychol 2016;7:763.
    11. Rahimi‑Madiseh M, Tavakol M, Dennick R, Nasiri J. Empathy in
    Iranian medical students: A preliminary psychometric analysis
    and differences by gender and year of medical school. Med Teach
    2010;32:e471‑8.
    12. Suh DH, Hong JS, Lee DH, Gonnella JS, Hojat M. The Jefferson
    Scale of Physician Empathy: A preliminary psychometric study
    and group comparisons in Korean physicians. Med Teach
    2012;34:e464‑8.
    13. Hojat M, LaNoue M. Exploration and confirmation of the latent
    variable structure of the Jefferson scale of empathy. Int J Med
    Educ 2014;5:73‑81.
    14. Jordan KD, Foster PS. Medical student empathy: Interpersonal
    distinctions and correlates. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract
    2016;21:1009‑22.
    15. Casas RS, Xuan Z, Jackson AH, Stanfield LE, Harvey NC,
    Chen DC. Associations of medical student empathy with clinical
    competence. Patient Educ Couns 2017;100:742‑7.
    16. Berg K, Blatt B, Lopreiato J, Jung J, Schaeffer A, Heil D, et al.
    Standardized patient assessment of medical student empathy:
    Ethnicity and gender effects in a multi‑institutional study. Acad
    Med 2015;90:105‑11.
    17. Archer E, Turner R. Measuring empathy in a group of South
    African undergraduate medical students using the student
    version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy. Afr J Prim Health Care
    Fam Med 2019;11:e1‑e5.
  2. 18. Sng G, Tung J, Ping YS, Lee SS, Win MT, Hooi SC, et al. Complex
    and novel determinants of empathy change in medical students.
    Korean J Med Educ 2016;28:67‑78.
    19. Park KH, Roh H, Suh DH, Hojat M. Empathy in Korean medical
    students: Findings from a nationwide survey. Med Teach
    2015;37:943‑8.
    20. Paro HB, Daud‑Gallotti RM, Tibério IC, Pinto RM, Martins MA.
    Brazilian version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy: Psychometric
    properties and factor analysis. BMC Med Educ 2012;12:73.
    21. Leombruni P, Di Lillo M, Miniotti M, Picardi A, Alessandri G,
    Sica C, et al. Measurement properties and confirmatory factor
    analysis of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy in Italian medical
    students. Perspect Med Educ 2014;3:419‑30.
    22. Preusche I, Wagner‑Menghin M. Rising to the challenge:
    Cross‑cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the
    adapted German version of the Jefferson Scale of Physician
    Empathy for Students (JSPE‑S). Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract
    2013;18:573‑87.
    23. Huang L, Thai J, Zhong Y, Peng H, Koran J, Zhao XD. The Positive
    Association Between Empathy and Self‑Esteem in Chinese
    Medical Students: A Multi‑Institutional Study. Front Psychol
    2019;10:1921.
    24. Light A, Gupta T, Burrows A, Nandakumar M, Daniel A,
    Karthikeyan S. Learning empathy: The medical student
    perspective. Clin Teach 2019;16:76‑7.
    25. Bernardo MO, Cecílio‑Fernandes D, Costa P, Quince TA,
    Costa MJ, Carvalho‑Filho MA. Physicians’ self‑assessed empathy
    levels do not correlate with patients’ assessments. PLoS One
    2018;13:e0198488.
    26. Moreto G, Santos IS, Blasco PG, Pessini L, Lotufo PA. Assessing
    empathy among medical students: A comparative analysis using
    two different scales in a Brazilian medical school. Educación
    Médica 2018;19:162‑70.
    27. Nasr K. Shiraz University School of Medicine: Its foundation and
    development. Arch Iran Med 2009;12:87‑92.
    28. Amini M, Kojuri J, Mahbudi A, Lotfi F, Seghatoleslam A,
    Karimian Z, et al. Implementation and evolution of the horizontal
    integration at Shiraz Medical School. J Adv Med Educ Prof
    2013;1:21‑7.
    29. Koohestani HR, Baghcheghi N. The effects of team‑based learning
    techniques on nursing students’ perception of the psycho‑social
    climate of the classroom. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2016;30:437.
    30. Dearnley C, Rhodes C, Roberts P, Williams P, Prenton S. Team
    based learning in nursing and midwifery higher education; a
    systematic review of the evidence for change. Nurse Educ Today
    2018;60:75‑83.
    31. Shariat SV, Habibi M. Empathy in Iranian medical students:
    Measurement model of the Jefferson scale of empathy. Med Teach
    2013;35:e913‑8.
    32. Santos MA, Grosseman S, Morelli TC, Giuliano IC, Erdmann TR.
    Empathy differences by gender and specialty preference in
    medical students: A study in Brazil. Int J Med Educ 2016;7:149‑53.
    33. Hassan S, Ibrahim MS, Hassan NG. The structural framework,
    implementation strategies and student’ perception of team‑based
    learning in undergraduate medical education of a medical school
    in Malaysia. Education in Medicine Journal 2018;10:53‑66.
    34. Benabbas R. Empathy in Iranian medical students: A comparison
    by age, gender, academic performance and specialty preferences.
    Med J Islam Repub Iran 2016;30:439.
    35. Yeo S. Differences and changes in the empathy of Korean medical
    students according to gender and vocational aptitude, before and
    after clerkship. Korean J Med Educ 2019;31:343‑55.
    36. Hojat M. Empathy in Patient Care: Antecedents, Development,
    Measurement, and Outcomes. Springer‑Verlag New York; 2007.
    37. Walther J, Miller SE, Sochacka NW. A model of empathy in
    engineering as a core skill, practice orientation, and professional
    way of being. J Eng Educ 2017;106:123‑48.
    38. Wündrich M, Schwartz C, Feige B, Lemper D, Nissen C,
    Voderholzer U. Empathy training in medical students‑A
    randomized controlled trial. Med Teach 2017;39:1096‑8.
    39. Amini M, Kojuri J, Karimian Z, Lotfi F, Moghadami M,
    Dehghani M, et al. Talents for future: Report of the second national
    medical science olympiad in Islamic Republic of Iran. Iran Red
    Crescent Med J 2011;13(6):377‑81.
    40. Salehi A, Harris N, Lotfi F, Hashemi N, KojouriJ, AminiM. Reform
    in medical and health sciences educational system: A Delphi
    study of faculty members’ views at Shiraz University of Medical
    Sciences. East Mediterr Health J 2014;20:151‑61.