Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Psychiatry, Fakir Mohan Medical College and Hospital, Balasore, Odisha, India

2 Department of Physiology, Pandit Raghunath Murmu Medical College and Hospital, Baripada, Odisha, India,

3 Department of Physiology, Raiganj Government Medical College and Hospital, Raiganj, West Bengal, India


BACKGROUND: Distance digital learning is newly implemented in the Indian medical institutions.
Formative assessment is also conducted online. In this context, this study aimed at finding the
perception on the usefulness of online formative assessment along with online classes among
1st‑year medical students.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross‑sectional, observational study was conducted in August
2020. The students were exposed to online classes and online formative assessments with five
multiple choice questions for a period of 4 months before the conduct of the survey. An online survey
was conducted (both quantitative and qualitative data collection) to ascertain the perception on the
online formative assessment quiz.
RESULTS: A total of 36 (14 female, 21 male, 1 did not disclose sex) 1st‑year medical students with a
mean age of 19.97 ± 1.16 years participated in the survey. The majority of the students agreed that the
online quiz was a valuable learning activity and has potential to replace the face‑to‑face assessment.
The online quizzes provided them feedback of classroom learning and helped in identifying the weak
area and motivated students to the study. The qualitative data showed that students like to get a
greater number of questions and also like to participate in chapter wise multiple quizzes in spare time.
CONCLUSION: First‑year medical students considered the online formative assessments quiz
coupled with the online classes as a valuable learning activity. It provided them feedback of learning
and a motivation for further study on the topic. They like to participate in anonymous quiz with a
greater number of questions with online classes. The finding of this pilot study should be further
evaluated with multicenter study with more participants.


1. Panda S. Higher education at a distance and national development:
Reflections on the Indian experience. Dis Educ 2005;26:205‑25.
2. Ahmed H, Allaf M, Elghazaly H. COVID‑19 and medical
education. Lancet Infect Dis 2020;20:777‑8.
3. Black P, Wiliam D. Developing the theory of formative assessment.
Educ Asse Eval Acc 2009;21:5.
4. Mondal H, Mondal S. Trait emotional intelligence and
self‑assessment of classroom learning in medical students. J Adv
Med Educ Prof 2020;8:109‑14.
5. Velan GM, Jones P, McNeil HP, Kumar RK. Integrated online
formative assessments in the biomedical sciences for medical
students: benefits for learning. BMC Med Educ 2008;8:52.
6. Kibble J. Use of unsupervised online quizzes as formative
assessment in a medical physiology course: effects of incentives
on student participation and performance. Adv Physiol Educ
7. Olson BL, McDonald JL. Influence of online formative assessment
upon student learning in biomedical science courses. J Dent Educ
8. Lull ME, Mathews JL. Online self‑testing resources prepared
by peer tutors as a formative assessment tool in pharmacology
courses. Am J Pharm Educ 2016;80:124.
9. Labarca J, Figueroa C, Huidobro B, Wright AC, Riquelme A,
Moreno R. Perception of medical students about formative
assessments during clinical courses. Rev Med Chile 2014;142:1193‑9.
10. Brown GA, Bice MR, Shaw BS, Shaw I. Online quizzes promote
inconsistent improvements on in‑class test performance in
introductory anatomy and physiology. Adv Physiol Educ
11. Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating
the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the
overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial
for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res
12. Sample Size Calculator. Creative Research Systems.
Available from:
.htm. [Last accessed on 2020 Sep 09].
13. Arja SB, Acharya Y, Alezaireg S, Ilavarasan V, Ala S, Arja SB.
Implementation of formative assessment and its effectiveness in
undergraduate medical education: an experience at a Caribbean
medical school. Med EdPublish 2018;7:63.
14. Prashanti E, Ramnarayan K. Ten maxims of formative assessment.
Adv Physiol Educ 2019;43:99‑102.
15. Ho VW, Harris PG, Kumar RK, Velan GM. Knowledge maps: a
tool for online assessment with automated feedback. Med Educ
Online 2018;23:1457394.
16. Malhotra SD, Shah KN, Patel VJ. Objective structured practical
examination as a tool for the formative assessment of practical
skills of undergraduate students in pharmacology. J Educ Health
Promot 2013;2:53.
17. Shahedi F, Ahmadi J, Sharifi T, Seyedhasani SN, Abdollahi M,
Shaabani N, et al. A new method of “student‑centered formative
assessment” and improving students’ performance: An effort
in the health promotion of community. J Educ Health Promot
18. Ranjan P, Ranjan R, Kumar M. National exit test: How will one
size fit all? Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2020;23:145‑9.