Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Community Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences (DU), Wardha, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Anatomy, Government Medical College, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India,
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lecturing (didactic) has been the key teaching-learning method for a long time.
As per competency-based medical education, an Indian medical graduate should be competent in
recommended skills. In the subject of Community Medicine of medical undergraduation, “Biostatistics”
is one of the components of the curriculum. Often the students find the statistics challenging to
understand and thus neglect it or prefer rote learning. In the recent era, many newer teachinglearning modalities have come up, namely problem-based learning (PBL), small group teaching,
community-based learning, etc. The objective was to compare the utility and effectiveness of PBL
versus traditional teaching techniques (didactic) for Biostatistics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in the department of Community Medicine,
Government Medical College, Azamgarh (Uttar Pradesh) from March to November 2019. A total of
96 medical students of the final year were randomly divided into two groups. ‘Group A’ underwent
didactic lecturing whereas “Group B” had problem‑based learning for identified topics in Biostatistics.
The teaching material and instructors were the same for both groups. Two weeks after completion
of sessions, students’ assessment was carried out for both groups.
RESULTS: The study demonstrated that the PBL method was a more effective way of teaching-learning
statistics compared to didactic lecturing. A significant difference (P < 0.05) was observed between
the mean examination score of Group A (traditional teaching technique) and Group B (PBL). Group
B had higher scores than group A in all assessment heads (Objective, Descriptive, and Viva-voce).
PBL was perceived to be a student-centric Teaching-learning method promoting analytical skills,
critical thinking & overall self-directed learning.
CONCLUSION: PBL teaching method was found to be effective in improving the students’
performance in Statistics in comparison to didactic lecturing.
Keywords
learning among medical students. J Community Med Health
Educ 2012;2:146.
2. Coles CR, Grant JG. Curriculum evaluation in medical and
health‑care education. Med Educ 1985;19:405‑22.
3. Paes ÂT. Perspectives on Teaching Biostatistics for Undergraduate
Medical Students using Team‑Based Learning. IASE Satellite
Paper. Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil; 2015. Available
from: http://atpaes@unifesp.br. [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 17].
4. Ishtiaq M, Iqbal N, Malik N, Rubab H, Hashim M. Project‑based
and case‑based learning of statistics in undergraduate nursing
students‑Islamabad: A mixed method study. Ann Pak Inst Med
Sci 2017;13:61‑7.
5. Competency Based Undergraduate Curriculum For The Indian
Medical Graduate. Medical Council of India, Pocket‑14, Sector‑ 8,
Dwarka New Delhi 110 077; 2018.
6. Sami W. Biostatistics education for undergraduate medical
students. Biomedica Vol. 26 (Jan.‑Jun) 2010;26:6.
7. Adeleye OA, Ofili AN. Difficulty in understanding statistics:
Medical students’ perspectives in a Nigerian University. Int J
Health Res 2009;2:233‑42.
8. Boyle CR. A problem based learning approach to teaching
biostatistics. Mississippi State University. J Statistics Educ
1999;7:N‑1.
9. Bland JM. Teaching statistics to medical students using
problem‑based learning: The Australian experience. BMC Med
Educ 2004;4:31.
10. Stander I. Teaching conceptual vs. theoretical statistics to
medical students. International Statistical Institute, 52nd Session;
1999. Available from: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/
publications/5/stan0219.pdf. [Last accessed on 2011 Dec 29].
11. Berry W. Surviving lecture: A pedagogical alternative. Coll Teach
2008;56:102‑6.
12. Shahabudin SH. Content coverage in problem‑based learning.
Med Educ 1987;21:310‑4.
13. Kaufman A, Mennin S, Waterman R, Duban S, Hansbarger C,
Silverblatt H, et al. The new Mexico experiment: Educational
innovation and institutional change. Acad Med 1989;64:285‑94.
14. Hwang SY, Kim MJ. A comparison of problem‑based learning and
lecture‑based learning in an adult health nursing course. Nurse
Educ Today 2006;26:315‑21.
15. McParland M, Noble LM, Livingston G. The effectiveness of
problem‑based learning compared to traditional teaching in
undergraduate psychiatry. Med Educ 2004;38:859‑67.
16. Ding XJ, Zhao L, Chu H, Tong N, Ni C, Hu Z, et al. Assessing the
effectiveness of problem‑based learning of preventive medicine
education in China. Sci Rep 2014;4:5126.
17. AndrewsM, JonesPR. Problem‑based learning in an undergraduate
nursing programme: A case study. J Adv Nurs 1996;23:357‑65.
18. Frost M. An analysis of the scope and value of problem‑based
learning in the education of health care professionals. J Adv Nurs
1996;24:1047‑53.
19. Kim SA, Kang IA, Kim S, Nam KA, Park JH. Development
of a problem‑based learning program in nursing education
curriculum. J Korean Psychiatr Nurs 2000;9:559‑70.
20. GibbonC. Problem Based Learning & Nursing. 2011. Available from:
http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/lid/ltweb. [Last accessed on 2020 Aug 10].
21. Tseng HC, Chou FH, Wang HH, Ko HK, Jian SY, Weng WC. The
effectiveness of problem‑based learning and concept mapping
among Taiwanese registered nursing students. Nurse Educ Today
2011;31:e41‑6.
22. Williams B. Self direction in a problem based learning program.
Nurse Educ Today 2004;24:277‑85.
23. Li G, Zhang L. The exploration of PBL teaching method applied
in medical statistics teaching. J Educ Jilin 2013;29:53‑5.
24. Claramita M, Budiharjo S, Suryadi E. Profile of the integrated
clinical skills competencies (ICSC) on students with and without
problem‑based learning exposure. 2nd Asia‑Pacific Conference on
Problem‑ Based Learning in Health Science; 2001. p. FP 25.
)