Journal of Education and Health Promotion

Evaluation of the effect of education on perceived stress of mother candidates for amniocentesis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

. Shahnaz Mojahed
. Fariba Reyhanizadeh 1
. Razieh Sadat Tabatabaei 2
. Ali Dehghani 3

1 Master Student of Counseling in Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

2 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Mother and Newborn Health Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran,

3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Yazd, Iran

Abstract
BACKGROUND: Amniocentesis is one of the methods for diagnosing prenatal abnormalities.
Pregnant women with high‑risk fetal screening results are the candidates for amniocentesis. Most
of these women are afraid of this procedure because they predict that the test will be painful and
worried about its adverse effects on pregnancy, fetal injury, or the risk of maternal death. Therefore,
the aim of this study was to determine the effect of education on the perceived stress of mothers
who are the candidates for amniocentesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was a quasi‑experimental, two‑group clinical trial
with a parallel design. This study was in three stages: pretest (before intervention), posttest (after
intervention), and after amniocentesis. This study was performed on 80 pregnant women who were
the candidates for amniocentesis (15–20 weeks of pregnancy) with high‑risk fetal screening results
referred to the perinatology clinic in Yazd in 2020. The intervention package included training and
using breathing techniques, broadcasting educational animations on how to perform amniocentesis,
expressing experiences by people who had experienced amniocentesis, and finally visiting the
amniocentesis site and getting to know the relevant perinatologist. Data collection tools were
demographic and midwifery profile questionnaires and Cohen perceived stress. SPSS software
version 16 was used for statistical analysis of data.
RESULTS: The results showed that the research units had high stress at the beginning of the
study. The perceived stress score at the beginning of the study in the intervention group was
30.1750 ± 6.53153 and in the control group was 28.2750 ± 8.57841. After the intervention, the
participants’ stress level decreased below the cutting point. In the experimental group, the mean
stresses after the intervention and after amniocentesis were significantly lower than before the
intervention; however, after amniocentesis, it was somewhat higher than the postintervention stage.
In the preintervention stage, the mean stress score between the two groups was not statistically
significant. The difference after the intervention between the two groups was significant (P < 001.0);
however, in the postamniocentesis stage, the difference in stress was not significant. After the
intervention and after amniocentesis, the perceived stress of pregnant mothers in the experimental
group was less than the control group.
CONCLUSION: Considering that the perceived stress in amniocentesis candidate mothers was
high in the present study, so that after performing the method, mothers left the center with high
stress, it is very important to pay attention to its psychological aspects. Therefore, it is suggested
that educational interventions before and during amniocentesis be considered for them along with
psychological support and follow‑up care after amniocentesis.

Keywords

Amniocentesis
education
perceived stress
1. Hasanzadeh R, Naghizadeh S, Azari S, Ebrahimpour Mirza
Rezaei M. Diagnosis of aneuploidies by amniocentesis in high risk
cases of first trimester screening test. Iran J Obstetrics Gynecol
Infertility 2014;17:18‑26.
2. Schut W, Weiner P. When to screen in Obstetrics and Gynecology
1 and 2. 1st ed. Qom: Fanose Andishe pub.; 2011.
3. Behrooz Ni, Yilagh S, Manijeh P. The relationship between
perfectionism, perceived stress and social support with academic
burnout. Culture Strategy 2013;5(20):83‑102.
4. Tara F, Lotfalizade M, Moeindarbari S. Evaluation of early and
late complications of amniocentesis in ommolbanin hospital in
Mashhad, Iran during 2014‑2016. Iran J Obstetrics Gynecol Infertil
2018;21:1‑4.
5. Niromanesh S, Mousavi Darzikolaei N, Rahimi‑Shaarbaf F,
Shirazi M. Pregnancy outcome in amniocentesis and chorionic
villous sampling: Ten‑year report. Tehran Univ Med J
2016;74:400‑7.
6. Karimi N, Bahadori F, Khalkhali HR, Rabiepoor S. Evaluation of
anxiety and perceived stress in mothers undergoing amniocentesis.
J Nurs Midwifery Urmia Univ Med Sci 2017;15:292‑300.
7. Abedi M, Sabory E, Rabiepour S, Rasouli J. The relationship
between stress in pregnancy, and pregnancy outcomes:
A longitudinal study. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Faculty
2017;14:969‑81.
8. Asghari F, Ghasemi JobnehR, Yousefi N, Saadat S, Rafiei Gazani F.
Role of perceived stress and coping styles on the eating disorders
of high school students of Rasht city in 2013. Community Health
J 2014;2:28‑38.
9. Piri‑Kamrani M, Dehghan F, Bashiri H. The effectiveness of stress
management skills training on perceived stress and resiliency of
women with multiple sclerosis. J Health Care 2016;17:319‑28.
10. Heidaran F, Sajjadian I, Fathi M. Effectiveness of hypnotherapy on
the perceived stress and blood pressure in patients with primary
hypertension. Med J Mashhad Univ Med Sci 2017;60:669‑80.
11. Hoseini ES, RahmatiR, Shaghaghi F, BeigiM, Mohebbi‑DehnaviZ.
The relationship between hope and happiness with prenatal care.
J Edu Health Promot 2020;9:206.
12. Asadi L, Bokaie M, Khavari F, Mohammadi M, Gandomani SJ.
Evaluation of the relationship between emotional intelligence
and sexual function of reproductive age women. J Educ Health
Promot 2020;9:93.
13. Noroozi M, Gholami M, Mohebbi‑Dehnavi Z. The relationship
between hope and resilience with promoting maternal attachment
to the fetus during pregnancy. J Educ Health Promot 2020;9:54.
14. Vasegh Rahimparvar SF, Hamzehkhani M, Geranmayeh M,
Rahimi R. Effect of educational software on self‑efficacy of
pregnant women to cope with labor: A randomized controlled
trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012;286:63‑70.
15. Beyrami M, Zahmatyar H, KHosroshahiJ. Prediction Strategies for
coping with stress during pregnancy on components of hardiness
and social support in nulliparous pregnant women. Iran J Nurs
Res 2013;7:1‑9.
16. Javidi‑Sarafan M, Tafazoli M, Khadivzadeh T, Mazloum SR.
Comparing the effect of standardized patient‑based education
and feedback lecture on midwives’ knowledge and practice in
counseling screening for fetal malformations. J Educ Health
Promot 2020;9:151.
17. Salmaani Barough N, Taghavi Larijani T, Monjamed Z, Sharifi N,
Bahrani N. Coping with stress. Hayat 2005;10:21‑7.
18. Biesecker BB. The psychological well-being of pregnant women
undergoing prenatal testing and screening: A narrative literature
review. Hastings Center Rep 2019;49:S53‑60.
19. Yazdanpanah E, Atghaei M, Hosseinifard S, Fazilat Pour M,
Jahani YA. A comparison between the effects of counseling
using approach and attentional bias modification based on
dot‑probe task on anxiety in pregnant women refering to kerman
health‑care center in: Schl Nurs Kerman Univ Med Sci Kerman
Iran. In Partial F’ulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree
MSc 2017;2:42‑54.
20. de Leeuw RA, van der Horst SF, de Soet AM, van Hensbergen JP,
Bakker PC, Westerman M, et al. Digital vs. face‑to‑face information
provision in patient counselling for prenatal screening:
A noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Prenatal Diagn
2019;39:456‑63.
21. Abedi M, Rasoli J, Rabiepour S, Saboory E. The relationship
between stress in pregnancy, and pregnancy outcomes:
A longitudinal study. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac 2017;14:81969.
22. Mparmpakas D, Goumenou A, Zachariades E, Pados G, Gidron Y,
Karteris E. Immune system function, stress, exercise and
nutrition profile can affect pregnancy outcome: Lessons from a
Mediterranean cohort. Exp Ther Med 2013;5:411‑8.
23. Karimi N, Rabiepour S, Khalkhali HR, Bahadori F. Evaluation
of anxiety and perceived stress in mothers undergoing
amniocentesis. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac 2017;292:300‑15.
24. Azh N, Ghasemi M, Khani M, Mafi M, Ranjkesh F. Relationship
between maternal stress and pregnancy outcomes: A prospective
study. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and
Infertility, 2019;22(5):27‑36. doi: 10.22038/ijogi.2019.13579
25. Shirazi M, Pooransari P, Rahimi Sharbaf F, Niromanesh SH,
Sahebdel B, Shariat M, et al. Correlation of maternal stress because
of positive aneuploidy screening serum analytes and uterine
arteries’ Doppler ultrasound index: A prospective cohort study.
Int J Fertil Steril 2019;12:329‑34.
26. Pop‑Tudose ME, Armean P, Pop VI. Women s emotional, profile
and the psychological, stress associated with waiting, for the
prenatal, diagnostic testing results. Ethnicity 2019;25:50‑20.
27. Sommerseth E, Sundby J. Women’s experiences when ultrasound
examinations give unexpected findings in the second trimester.
Women Birth 2010;23:111‑6.
28. Bratt EL, Järvholm S, Ekman‑Joelsson BM, Mattson LÅ,
Mellander M. Parent’s experiences of counselling and their need
for support following a prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart
disease‑a qualitative study in a Swedish context. BMC Pregnancy
Childbirth 2015;15:171.
29. ALIPOOR M, GHAHREMANI L, AMOOEI S, KESHAVARZI
S . Evaluation of the effectiveness of relaxation techniques on depression, anxiety and stress in pregnant women: Based on
self‑efficacy theory. Sci J Kurdistan Univ Med Sci 2017;22:20‑30.
30. Halajani F, Jameinezhad F, DashtBozorgiZ, Peymani ForoshaniR,
EsmaeiliShad B. The Effect of Cognitive Rehabilitation Group
Training on Perceived Stress, Depression and Quality of Life
among Primigravid Women with Pregnancy Anxiety. IJRN. 2019;
6(1):10‑17
31. Esfehani A. The Effect of Life Skills Training on Pregnancy
Anxiety, Perceived Stress and Mental Health of Primiparous
Women. Tehran: Payam Noor University of Tehran; 2011.
32. Abbasalizadeh F, Sahhaf F, Mousavi S, Ranjbar F, Dargahi R,
Javid M. Comparing the Ratio of Anxiety and Depression in
Women with Positive Aneuploidy Screening Result before
and after Amniocentesis Result. J Biochem Tech. (2019) Special
Issue(2):185‑191.
33. Tursinawati Y, Thain S, Choi C, Seow GH. Amniocentesis
increases level of anxiety in women with invasive prenatal
diagnosis of Down syndrome. Univ Med 2015;34:20‑112.
34. Lim EX, Sim AY, Forde CG, Cheon BK. The role of perceived
stress and gender on portion selection patterns. Physiol Behav
2018;194:205‑11.
35. Brunton RJ, Dryer R, Krägeloh C, Saliba A, Kohlhoff J,
Medvedev O. The pregnancy‑related anxiety scale: A validity
examination using Rasch analysis. J Affect Disord 2018;236:127‑35.
36. Durand MA, Stiel M, Boivin J, Elwyn G. Information and decision
support needs of parents considering amniocentesis: Interviews
with pregnant women and health professionals. Health Expect
2010;13:125‑38.
37. Ng CC, Lai FM, Yeo GS. Assessment of maternal anxiety levels
before and after amniocentesis. Singapore Med J 2004;45:370‑4.
38. Khoursandi M, Vakilian K, Torabi Goudarzi M, Abdi M.
Childbirth preparation using behavioral‑cognitive skill in
childbirth outcomes of primiparous women. J Babol Univ Med
Sci 2013;15:80‑76.
39. Gholami M, Moallem SA, Afshar M, Etemad L, Karimi G.
Gestational exposure to silymarin increases susceptibility of
BALB/c mice fetuses to apoptosis. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol
2017;9:66‑70.
40. Saeidi R, Ziadi Lotf Abadi M, Saeidi A, Gholami Robatsangi M.
The effectiveness of mother infant interaction on infantile colic.
Iran J Neonatol 2013;4:34‑8.
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
Volume 11, Issue 6
July 2021
Pages 1-7

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us