Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran,

2 Department of Psychiatry, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3 Social Welfare Management Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Anatomy and Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Tehran, Iran School of Medicine, Iran Medical University, Tehran, Iran

5 Department of Biostatistics, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

6 Department of Nursing, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

7 Health Research Center, Life Style Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

8 Medical Student, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: According to the World Health Organization, estimates about 1,800,000 people lived
with disability in Tehran. Against there is little evidence of physical access to rehabilitation facilities
in Tehran. This study is aimed to assess the physical access to physical rehabilitation facilities in
Tehran and compare it with the country.
METHODS: This is a cross‑sectional study conducted since January to April 2017. We used a master
facilities list of rehabilitation facility that developed in Iran to collect the information. The samples of
this study included all existing physical rehabilitation centers in Tehran province. Data analysis was
done using the SPSSr version 21.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
RESULTS: The results showed that rehabilitation facilities existed at different levels, including
inpatient (10.51), outpatient (224.28), community based (36.72), and long‑term care (4.96)/1,000,000
populations. Rehabilitation services are provided by rehabilitation professional including: Physical
medicine and rehabilitation specialists (8.7), physiotherapists (132.89), occupational therapists (57.4),
speech therapists (42.11), and audiologists (48.84) (in 1,000,000 populations).
CONCLUSION: Tehran needs to increase the physical access to rehabilitation facilities and
compared with country was disproportionate physical access to facilities in most cases. It
is necessary to establish an interdisciplinary referral system between different rehabilitation
providers.

Keywords

  1. World Health Organization. World Report on Disability. Geneva:
    World Health Organization; 2011. Available from: http://www.
    who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf. [Last
    accessed on 2015 Nov 14].
    2. Shirazikhah M, Mirabzadeh A, Sajadi H, Joghataei M T,
    Biglarian A, Mohammadi Shahboulaghi F, et al. Development and
    psychometric properties of the physical rehabilitation services
    acceptability questionnaire. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2019;33:202-9.
    3. State Welfare Organization Tehran: Behzisti Organization; 2015.
    Available from: http://www.behzisti.ir/. [Last accessed on 2015
    Dec 14].
    4. Rehabilitation Services Tehran: Iranian Red Crescent Society;
    2016. Available from: http://tavanbakhshi.rcs.ir/index.jsp?sitei
    d=47&fkeyid=&siteid=47&pageid=1089&newsview=90231. [Last
    accessed on 2016 May 01].
  2. 5. Rehabilitation Settings Tehran: Ministry of Health and Medical
    Education; 2015. Available from: http://www.behdasht.gov.ir/
    index.jsp?fkeyid=&siteid=1&pageid=1223.[Last accessed on 2016
    Jan 16].
    6. Shirazikhah M, Mirabzadeh A, Sajadi H, Joghataei MT,
    Biglarian A, Mousavi T, et al. National survey of availability of
    physical rehabilitation services in Iran: A mixed methods study.
    Electronic Phys 2017;9:5778.
    7. WHO, WB. World Report on Disability. Geneva: World Health
    Organization; 2011. Available from: http://www.who.int/
    disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf. [Last accessed on
    2015 Nov 14].
    8. World Health Organization. What is Universal Coverage: World
    Health Organization; 2014. Available from: http://www.who.
    int/health_financing/universal_coverage_definition/en/. [Last
    accessed on 2015 Dec 12].
    9. World Health Organization. Service Availability and Readiness
    Assessment (SARA): An Annual Monitoring System for Service
    Delivery: Reference Manual; 2014. p. 7-16.
    10. Passalent LA, Landry MD, Cott CA. Exploring wait list
    prioritization and management strategies for publicly funded
    ambulatory rehabilitation services in ontario, Canada: Further
    evidence of barriers to access for people with chronic disease.
    Healthc Policy 2010;5:e139-56.
    11. Alam B, Mridha MK, Biswas TK, Roy L, Rahman M,
    Chowdhury ME. Coverage of emergency obstetric care and
    availability of services in public and private health facilities in
    Bangladesh. Int J Gynecol Obstetrics 2015;131:63-9.
    12. WHO. Service Availability and Readiness Assessment (SARA):
    An Annual Monitoring System for Service Delivery: Reference
    Manual; 2014. p. 27-9.
    13. Rayegani S. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Specialist
    Position in the Structure of the National Health and Referral
    System Tehran, Iran: Aja University of Medical Sciences; 2012.
    Available from: http://eprints.ajaums.ac.ir/2513/. [Last accessed
    on 2015 Nov 16].
    14. Willems D, Salter K, Meyer M, McClure A, Teasell R, Foley N.
    Determining the need for in-patient rehabilitation services
    post-stroke: Results from eight ontario hospitals. Healthc Policy
    2012;7:e105-18.
    15. Medical Rehabilitation in 2011 and Beyond. London: Royal college
    of Physicians & British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine; 2010.
    Available from: www.rcplondon.ac.uk. [Last accessed on 2015
    Nov 16].
    16. Raissi G, Ahadi T, Forogh B, Manesaz E. Status of the physical
    medicine and rehabilitation in the health system and medical
    education (Letter to the editor). J Med Council Iran 2012;30:78-9.
    17. Harris-Kojetin L, Sengupta M, Park-Lee E, Valverde R. LongTerm Care Services in the United States: 2013 Overview. Vital &
    Health Statistics Series 3, Analytical and Epidemiological Studies/
    [US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service,
    National Center for Health Statistics; 2013. p. 1-107.
    18. Australasian Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine. Standards
    for the provision of Inpatient Adult Rehabilitation Medicine
    ServicesinPublic and Private Hospitals2011. Available from:
    https://www.racp.edu.au/docs/default-source/policy-andadvocacy/afrm/afrm-standards-provision-of-inpatient-adultrehabilitation-medicine-services-2011.pdf?sfvrsn=564f2d1a_6.
    19. Nasiripour AA, Tabibi J, Afkar A, Kamali M. Effect of communitybased rehabilitation program implementation on disabled people
    living conditions in Iran. J Knowledge Health 2012;7:173-8.
    20. Cheng Y, Rosenberg MW, Wang W, Yang L, Li HJ. Medicine.
    Aging, health and place in residential care facilities in Beijing.
    China 2011;72:365-72.
    21. Soltaninejad M, Khammar A, Aminizadeh M, NabiAmjad R, Raei
    M, Hami M, et al. Shift working disorders among nurses of Tehran
    hospital and its related factors in 2016. Work. 2020;66:213-9.
    22. World Health Organization. Monitoring Human Resources
    for Health-Related Rehabilitation Services: World Health
    Organization; 2009. Available from: http://www.who.int/hrh/
    statistics/spotlight _7_en.pdf. [Last accessed on 2015 Dec 16].
    23. Rehabilitation W. A Call for Action Plan: The Need to Scale up
    Rehabilitation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.
    24. Cooney MT, Carroll Á. Cost effectiveness of inpatient
    rehabilitation in patients with brain injury. Clin Med 2016;16:10913.
    25. Costigan FA, Light JJ. A review of preservice training in
    augmentative and alternative communication for speech-language
    pathologists, special education teachers, and occupational
    therapists. Assist Technol 2010;22:200‑12.