Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 1 Sirjan School of Medical Science, Sirjan, Iran, Management and Leadership in Medical Education Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences. Kerman, Iran

2 Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Medical Informatics Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences Kerman, Iran,

4 Integrative Functional Gastroenterology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Clinical rounds provide opportunities for medical students to acquire essential
skills to practice medicine in the real world. Although this kind of training is one of the most important
components of medical education, it is replete with barriers in its effective implementation. This study
aimed to investigate medical students’ experiences concerning the barriers and strategies of clinical
rounds in Kerman University of Medical Sciences (KMU).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This qualitative research was conducted on 12 medical students
in KMU in 2017. Purposive sampling was used and participants in three grades (stagers, interns,
and residents) were selected, and individual semi‑structured interviews were conducted until data
saturation. The average of the interview time differed among the three batches (stagers, 51 min;
interns, 38 min; and residents, 31 min). Content analysis using deductive approach was used for
data analysis. MAXQDA version 10 was used for data analysis.
RESULTS: Data analysis yielded the identification of six themes related to the system of clinical
education, fields of clinical education, clinical environment, educational program, medical teachers,
and medical students concerning the barriers and five themes related to the strategies for clinical
rounds.
CONCLUSIONS: Findings revealed a deeper understanding of medical students’ experiences. Our
investigation identified multiple challenges embedded in our context and strategies to overcome
them. As teaching in clinical rounds is invaluable, there is a need to take into account the identified
challenges and overcome them. Thus, more effective rounds with higher efficacy toward students’
professional development can be implemented.

Keywords

1. Beigzadeh A, Bahaadinbeigy K, Adibi P, Yamani N. Identifying
the challenges to good clinical rounds: A focus‑group study of
medical teachers. J Adv Med Educ Prof 2019;7:62‑73.
2. Beigzadeh A, Adibi P, Bahaadinbeigy K, Yamani N. Strategies for
teaching in clinical rounds: A systematic review of the literature.
J Res Med Sci 2019;24:33.
3. Adibi P, Anjevian M. The clinical rounds on patients’ bedside
in internal ward from patients’ viewpoints. Iran J Med Edu
2006;6:15‑21.
4. Gonzalo JD, HeistBS, DuffyBL, DyrbyeL, FaganMJ, FerenchickG,
et al. Identifying and overcoming the barriers to bedside rounds:
A multicenter qualitative study. Acad Med 2014;89:326‑34.
5. Williams KN, Ramani S, Fraser B, OrlanderJD. Improving bedside
teaching: Findings from a focus group study of learners. Acad
Med 2008;83:257‑64.
6. Beigzadeh A, Yamani N, Bahaadinibeigi K, Adibi P. Challenges
and problems of clinical medical education in Iran: A systematic
review of the literature. Stride Dev Med Edu 2019;16:e89897.
7. Adibi P, Enjavian M, Alizadeh R, Omid A. The effect of ward
round teaching on patients: The health team and the patients’
perspectives. J Educ Health Promot 2013;2:35.
8. Gandomkar R, Salsali M, Mirzazadeh A. Factors influencing
medical education in clinical environment: Experiences of clinical
faculty members. Iran J Med Edu 2011;11:279‑90.
9. Seabrook MA. Medical teachers’ concerns about the clinical
teaching context. Med Educ 2003;37:213‑22.
10. Hoffman KG, Donaldson JF. Contextual tensions of the clinical
environment and their influence on teaching and learning. Med
Educ 2004;38:448‑54.
11. Tang FI, Chou SM, Chiang HH. Students’ perceptions of effective and ineffective clinical instructors. J Nurs Educ 2005;44:187‑92.
12. Moonaghi HK, Hoseinzadeh MM, Beinaghi T, Lake MA.
A practical guide for effective clinical teaching Mashhad:
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences; 2010.
13. Beigzadeh A, Okhovati M, Mehrolhasani MH, Shokoohi M,
Bazrafshan A. challenges of the bachelor program of health
services management: A qualitative study. J Health Adm
2014;17:29‑42.
14. Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv
Nurs 2008;62:107‑15.
15. Streubert HJ, Carpenter DR. Qualitative research in nursing:
Advancing the humanistic imperative. Philadelphia: Lippincott
Publication; 1995.
16. Nasri K, Kahbazy M, Noroozy A, Nasri S. The medical education
problems and possible solutions in stagers and intern’s viewpoints
of Arak University of Medical Sciences, 2006‑07. AMUJ
2010;12:111‑21.
17. Arabshahi KS, Haghani F, Bigdeli S, Omid A, Adibi P. Challenges
of the ward round teaching based on the experiences of medical
clinical teachers. J Res Med Sci 2015;20:273‑80.
18. Niroumand E, Khazaei MR, Vaziri S, Najafi F, Karami Matin B.
Quality of ambulatory education from the viewpoint of the clinical
medical students at Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences.
Educ Res Med Sci 2014;3:3‑9.
19. Claridge A. What is the educational value of ward rounds? A
learner and teacher perspective. Clin Med (Lond) 2011;11:558‑62.
20. Ahmady S, Hosseini M A, Homam S M, Farajpour A, Ghitaghi M,
Hosseini‑Abardeh M. Challenges of medical education at Islamic
Azad University, Iran, from faculty perspectives: A qualitative
content analysis. Stride Dev Med Educ 2016;13:14‑132.
21. Shams B, Jamshidian S, Changiz T. Educational challenges
in ambulatory pediatrics teaching programs based on the
experiences of Interns and attends: A qualitative study. Stride
Dev Med Educ 2011;7:81‑91.
22. Sharifi B, Shirazi HR, Momeninejad M, Saniee F, Hashemi N,
Jabarnejad A, et al. A survey of the quality and quantity of clinical
education from the viewpoint of medical students. J Jahrom Univ
Med Sci 2012;10:57‑63.
23. Azemian A, Motamed N, Yousefi MR. Barriers and facilitating
factors in learning of effective clinical teaching in Bushehr
University of Medical Sciences: Clinical Students, Point of View.
Journal of Educational Development of Jundishapur 2015;6:8‑17.
24. Khan IA. Bedside teaching‑making it an effective instructional
tool. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2014;26:286‑9.
25. Zahedi M, Amirmaleki Tabrizi H. Medical education effectiveness
from the viewpoints of medical students of Tehran University of
Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Edu 2008;7:289‑98.
26. Siabani S, Moradi MR, Siabani H, Rezaei M, Siabani S, Amolaei K,
et al. Students’ view points on the educational problems in medical
school of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (2007).
J Kermansha Unive Med Sci 2009;13:162‑71.
27. Al‑Swailmi FK, Khan IA, Mehmood Y, Al‑Enazi SA, Alrowaili M,
Al‑Enazi MM. Students’ perspective of bedside teaching:
A qualitative study. Pak J Med Sci 2016;32:351‑5.
28. Roy B, Castiglioni A, Kraemer RR, Salanitro AH, Willett LL,
Shewchuk RM, et al. Using cognitive mapping to define
key domains for successful attending rounds. J Gen
Intern Med 2012;27:1492‑8.
29. Najafi N, Monash B, Mourad M, Ding Y, Glass M, Burrell GJ,
et al. Improving attending rounds: Qualitative reflections from
multidisciplinary providers. Hosp Pract (1995) 2015;43:186‑90.
30. Indraratna PL, Greenup LC, Yang TX. Bedside teaching in
Australian Clinical Schools: A national study. J Biomed Educ
2013;2013:948651.
31. Shehab A. Clinical teachers’ opinions about bedside‑based clinical
teaching. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2013;13:121‑6.
32. Jalalvandi F, Yeganeh N, Shahsavari S, Ghorbani S, Moradi O,
Ahmadi S, et al. Evaluation of medical students’ views on
the current state of clinical education. J Clin Res Paramed Sci
2014;2:260‑6.
33. Bahmanbijari B, Beigzadeh A, Etminan A, Najarkolai AR,
Khodaei M, Askari SM. The perspective of medical students
regarding the roles and characteristics of a clinical role model.
Electron Physician 2017;9:4124‑30.
34. Bahman Bijari B, Zare M, Haghdoost AA, Bazrafshan A,
Beigzadeh A, Esmaili M. Factors associated with students’
perceptions of role modelling. Int J Med Educ 2016;7:333‑9.
35. Esmaeili M, Haghdoost AA, Beigzadeh A, Bahmanbijari B,
Bazrafshan A. Personal and scientific characteristics of positive
and negative role models among medical educators from the
viewpoint of dentistry and pharmacy students in Kerman
University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Stride Dev Med Edu
2013;10:298‑311.
36. Mosalanejad L, Hojjat M, Badeyepeyma Z. A comprehensive
evaluation of the quality and barriers of bedside teaching from
professors’ point of view. Int J Nurs Edu 2013;5:233‑8.
37. Vali L, Shokoohi M, Beigzadeh A. Characteristics of a capable
university teacher the viewpoints of faculty members of health
services management department in Iranian Medical Universities.
Iran J Med Edu 2014;14:90‑100.
38. Beigzadeh A, Shokoohi M, Vali L. Characteristics of a capable
university lecturer from the viewpoints of health services
management students in Iranian Medical Universities. Stride Dev
Med Educ 2014;11:e60068.
39. Bahmanbijar B, Nazarieh M, Toufan N, Dehghani M, Beigzadeh A.
Identification of the reasons behind students’ lack of participation
in classroom activities using a Delphi technique. Future Med Edu
J 2019;9:10‑7.
40. Jaberi AA, Zamani F, Nadimi AE, Bonabi TN. Effect of family
presence during teaching rounds on patient’s anxiety and
satisfaction in cardiac intensive care unit: A double‑blind
randomized controlled trial. J Edu Health Promot 2020;9:22.
41. Yousefy A, Changiz T, Yamani N, Zahrai R., Ehsanpour S.
Developing a holistic accreditation system for medical universities
of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2009) Eastern Mediterranean
Health Journal, 15 (3), pp. 747‑756. https://www.scopus.com/
inward/record.uri?eid=2‑s2.0‑69949188836&partnerID=40&md
5=79c7c3c16f35b1f6a114534ed435bc57.
42. Yamani N, Moosavi SA, Alizadeh M, Khorvash F, Ghiasi M.
A 360‑degree performance evaluation of emergency medicine
ward in Alzahra Hospital. (2012) JPMA. The Journal of the
Pakistan Medical Association, 62 (3 Suppl 2), pp. S13‑17. https://
www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2‑s2.0‑84866155538&
partnerID=40&md5=df91d8690287af0b1520126ce3c5acc0.