1. Guha‑Sapir D, Hoyois P, Below R. Annual Disaster Statistical
Review 2014: The Numbers and Trends. Centre for Research on
the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED); 2015.
2. Database, E.‑D.T.I.D. Available from: http://www.emdat.
be/. [Last accessed on 2017 Apr 13].
3. Allen J, O’toole W, Harris R, McDonnell I. Festival and Special
Event Management, Google eBook. Australia; John Wiley and
Sons; 2012.
4. Wachinger G, Renn O, Bianchizza C, Coates T, De Marchi B,
Domènech L, et al. Risk Perception and Natural Hazards.
CapHaz‑Net WP3 Report, DIALOGIK Non‑Profit Communication
and Cooperative Research, Stuttgart; 2010. (Available at:
http://caphaz‑net.org/outcomes‑results/CapHaz‑Net_WP3_
Risk‑Perception.pdf).
5. Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG. Risk as analysis
and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and
rationality. Risk Anal 2004;24(3):11‑22.
6. Anderson‑Berry L, Iroi C, Rangi A. The Environmental and
Societal Impacts of Cyclone Zoë and the Effectiveness of the
Tropical Cyclone Warning Systems in Tikopia and Anuta. James
Cook University Centre for Disaster Studies; 2003.
7. Wachinger G, Renn O, Begg C, Kuhlicke C. The risk perception
paradox – implications for governance and communication of
natural hazards. Risk Anal 2013;33(10):49‑65.
8. Sjoberg L. Risk perception by the public and by experts:
A dilemma in risk management. Hum Ecol Rev 1999;6(2):1‑9.
9. Aitsi‑Selmi A, Egawa S, Sasaki H, Wannous C, Murray V. The
Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction: Renewing the global
commitment to people’s resilience, health, and well‑being. Int J
Disaster Risk Sci 2015;6(1):64‑76.
10. KellensW, TerpstraT, De MaeyerP. Perception and communication of flood risks: A systematic review of empirical research. Risk Anal
2013;33(1):24‑49.
11. Sjöberg L. Risk Perception and Credibility of Risk Communication.
Stockholm School of Economics (Sweden). Center for Risk
Research; 1992.
12. Siegrist M, Cvetkovich G. Perception of hazards: The role of social
trust and knowledge Risk Anal 2000;20(7):13‑9.
13. Buchecker M, Salvini G, Baldassarre GD, Semenzin E, Maidl E,
Marcomini A. The role of risk perception in making flood
risk management more effective. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci
2013;13:3013‑30.
14. Alshehri SA, Rezgui Y, Li H. Public perceptions and attitudes to
biological risks: Saudi Arabia and regional perspectives. Disasters
2016;40:799‑815.
15. Assarroudi A, Heshmati Nabavi F, Armat MR, Ebadi A,
Vaismoradi M. Directed qualitative content analysis: The
description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and
data analysis process. J Res Nurs 2018;23(1):42‑55.
16. Yang K. Public administrators’ trust in citizens: A missing link in
citizen involvement efforts. Public Adm Rev 2005;65(2):73‑85.
17. Morgan RM, Hunt SD. The commitment‑trust theory of
relationship marketing. J Mark 1994;58(3):20‑38.
18. Asgarizadeh Z, Rafieyan M, Dadashipoor H, Empirical model
of household’s earthquake risk mitigation behaviors using path
analysis method. Geogr Environ Hazard 2015;15:9‑14.
19. Sjöberg L, Moen BE, Rundmo T. Explaining risk perception.
An evaluation of the psychometric paradigm in risk perception
research. Norway: The Research Council’s RISIT (Risk and Safety
in Transport) 2004;10:665‑12.
20. Goddard S. Disaster Preparedness Knowledge, Beliefs,
Risk‑Perceptions, and Mitigating Factors of Disaster Preparedness
Behaviors of Undergraduate Students at a Large Midwest
University. AT Still University of Health Sciences; 2017.
21. Seyedin H, Samadipour E, Salmani Nodushan I, editors.
Interventional Strategies for Disaster Risk Perception
Improvement: All‑Hazard Approach, in Disaster Risk Perception,
Department of Health in Disaster and Emergencies; 2018.
22. Seyedin SH, Jamali HR. Health information and communication
system for emergency management in a developing country, Iran.
J Med Syst 2011;35:591‑7.