Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- . Marie Gilbert Majella
- . Gokul Sarveswaran
- . Yuvaraj Krishnamoorthy
- . K. Sivaranjini
- . Kalaiselvy Arikrishnan
- . S. Ganesh Kumar
Abstract
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Almost 15% of all pregnant women can develop potentially life‑threatening
complications. As a result, identification of high‑risk pregnancy at earliest stage will be useful in
directing appropriate intervention. Hence, the current study was done to determine the prevalence
and outcome of high‑risk pregnancy among antenatal women in rural Puducherry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A record‑based longitudinal study was done during March 2018
among 569 antenatal women who have attended rural health center of tertiary care institute. High‑risk
pregnancy was classified based on the guidelines from Pradhan Mantri Surakshit Matritva Abhiyan
and outcome assessment based on the obstetric and neonatal outcomes.
RESULTS: Among 569 antenatal case record reviewed, 315 (55.3%) were in the age group of
20–25 years and majority (463, 81.4%) belonged to below poverty line families; 410 (74.3%) registered
their current pregnancy within the first trimester. The prevalence of high‑risk pregnancy among study
participants was 18.3% (95% confidence interval: 15.3%–21.7%). Majority (81.9%) had term delivery.
Regarding obstetric and neonatal outcomes, majority had spontaneous vaginal delivery (73.9%);
about 10.4% gave birth to low‑birth weight baby, and only 1.7% had stillbirth. Parity, socioeconomic
status, and unfavorable outcomes such as low‑birth weight, preterm, and postterm delivery were
associated with high‑risk pregnancy.
CONCLUSION: The current study found that almost one‑fifth of the pregnant women in rural area have
high‑risk pregnancy. Unfavorable obstetric and neonatal outcomes were common among high‑risk
cases. Hence, early detection of high‑risk pregnancy needs to be done at primary health‑care level
to improve the maternal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes.
Keywords
for Midwives and Doctors. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2017.
2. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Pradhan Mantri Surakshit
Matritva Abhiyan. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare; 2016.
3. World Health Organization 10 Facts on Maternal Health. World
Health Organization. Available from: http://www.who.int/
features/factfiles/maternal_health/en/. [Last accessed on
2018 Apr 24].
4. Backett EM, Davis AM, Petroz‑Barzavian A. The Risk Approach in
Health Care with Special Reference to Natural and Child Health.
World Health Organization Public Health Papers. No. 76. Geneva:
World Health Organization; 1984. p. 113.
5. Nasah BT, Leke RJ, Doh AS, Moyo JK, Fomulu J, Njikam OM, et al.
The risk approach for reducing maternal mortality: The yaounde
experience. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1991;36:195‑201.
6. SinghR, ChauhanR, Nandan D, Singh H, Gupta SC, Bhatnagar M.
Morbidity profile of women during pregnancy: A hospital
record based study in western UP. Indian J Community Health
2012;24:342‑6.
7. Jnaneswari K, Manjubala D. Perinatal outcome in high risk
pregnancies. Int Res J Med Sci 2016;4:1‑4.
8. Jadhao AR, Gawade MD, Ughade SN. Outcome of pregnancy
among high risk pregnancies in rural area of Nagpur,
Maharashtra, Central India. Int J Community Med Public Health
2017;4:628‑33.
9. Mehta B,Vijay K, Amandeep K, Sumit C, Manisha M. Prevalence
and correlates of high risk pregnancy in rural Haryana:
A community based study. Int J Basic Appl Med Sci 2013;3:212‑7.
10. Jaideep KC, Prashant D, Girija A. Prevalence of high risk among
pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in rural field practice
area of Jawaharlal Nehru medical college, Belgavi, Karnataka,
India. Int J Community Med Public Health 2017;4:1257‑9.
11. Kumar MP, Gnanadeep NV, Dixit UR, Patil PS. Prevalence of high
risk pregnancy in rural Dharwad. J Dent Med Sci 2015;14:29‑32.
)