Document Type : Original Article
Authors
- . Deepthi Athuluru
- . Chandrasekhara Reddy
- . K. M. Sudhir, Krishna Kumar
- . Sreenivasulu Gomasani
- . Sreenivas Nagarakanti
Periodontics, Narayana Dental College and Hospital, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Indian national law namely Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA)
exists since 2003 and aims at protecting all the people in our country, but smoking is still prevalent
among people. This study was aimed to assess awareness, attitudes, and practices regarding
prohibition of sale of tobacco products near educational institutions of Nellore city, India.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive cross‑sectional study was conducted in degree
colleges of Nellore city of Andhra Pradesh. The study population includes institutional personnel
(student, teaching staff, nonteaching staff, and workers) of selected degree colleges of Nellore city.
A structured questionnaire was designed for this study which was validated by Davis criteria; reliability
was assessed by test–retest design. The questionnaire was divided into five parts consisting of
demographic details (age and gender), smoking behavior, knowledge about tobacco control laws,
attitudes toward the law and policies, and practices followed in the institution. Logistic regression
analysis was used to find out the association between different independent variables to tobacco
usage among institutional personnel.
RESULTS: Among the study population (n = 400 [100%]), 75.8% of the teaching staff do not know
that there should be a board in the institution saying that “sale of tobacco product in an area within
the radius of 100 m of educational institution is strictly prohibited,” 82.2% of the study population were
not aware to whom should they report, 96.3% of the study population accepted that strict execution
of COTPA law saves life, the participants who answered no to strict implementation of COTPA law,
and to punish the person who is violating the COTPA law are susceptible to 0.28, and 0.14 times
greater odds to be a smokeless tobacco user, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The study concluded that there was lack of knowledge about smoke‑free legislation
among the study population and a high support for strict implementation of COTPA.
Keywords
Control. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Document production
Services, Geneva; 2004.
2. The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of
Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce,
Production, Supply and Distribution) Amendment Bill
2015. Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family
Welfare (Tobacco Control Division); 2015. p. 5‑6.
3. Chezhian C, Murthy S, Prasad S, Kasav JB, Mohan SK, Sharma S,
et al. Exploring factors that influence smoking initiation
and cessation among current smokers. J Clin Diagn Res
2015;9:LC08‑12.
4. Davis LL. Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel
of experts. App Nurs Res 1992;5:194‑7.
5. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity.
Nurs Res 1986;35:382‑5.
6. Waltz CF, Bausell RB. Nursing Research: Design, Statistics, and
Computer Analysis. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis; 1981.
7. GATS India Report‑South‑East Asia Regional Office. Available
from: http://www.searo.who.int/LinkFiles/Regional_Tobacco_
Surveillance_System_GATS_India.pdf.[Last accessed on
2017 Oct 25].
8. India Use of Tobacco Factsheet NFHS‑3 Survey finding. Available
from: http://www.whoindia.org/LinkFiles/Tobacco_Free_
Initiative_nfhs3.pdf [Last accessed on 2016 Oct 20].
9. Grills NJ, Singh R, Singh R, Martin BC. Tobacco usage in
Uttarakhand: A dangerous combination of high prevalence,
widespread ignorance, and resistance to quitting. Biomed Res
Int 2015;2015:132120.
10. Saraswathi TR, Ranganathan K, Shanmugam S, Sowmya R,
Narasimhan PD, Gunaseelan R, et al. Prevalence of oral lesions
in relation to habits: Cross‑sectional study in South India. Indian
J Dent Res 2006;17:121‑5.
11. Sansone GC, Raute LJ, Fong GT, Pednekar MS, Quah AC,
Bansal‑Travers M, et al. Knowledge of health effects and intentions
to quit among smokers in India: Findings from the tobacco Control
Policy (TCP) India pilot survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health
2012;9:564‑78.
12. Desai KT, Gharat VV, Nayak SN, Patel PB, Bansal R. Tobacco
smoking patterns, awareness and expenditure: A cross‑sectional
overview from Surat city, India. Tob Control Public Health East
Eur 2012;2:25‑32. Available from: http://www.andreevin.narod.
ru/ [Last accessed on 2016 Oct 24l.
13. Goel S, Singh RJ, Sharma D, Singh A. Public opinion about
smoking and smoke free legislation in a district of North India.
Indian J Cancer 2014;51:330‑4.
14. Behbehani NN, Hamadeh RR, Macklai NS. Knowledge of
and attitudes towards tobacco control among smoking and
non‑smoking physicians in 2 Gulf Arab states. Saudi Med J
2004;25:585‑91.
15. GTSS Collaborative Group. A cross country comparison of
exposure to second hand smoke among youth. Tob Control
2006;15 Suppl 2:ii4‑19.
16. Hilton S, Semple S, Miller BG, MacCalman L, Petticrew M,
Dempsey S, et al. Expectations and changing attitudes of bar
workers before and after the implementation of smoke‑free
legislation in Scotland. BMC Public Health 2007;7:206.
17. Cantrell J, Pearson JL, Anesetti‑Rothermel A, Xiao H, Kirchner TR,
Vallone D, et al. Tobacco retail outlet density and young adult
tobacco initiation. Nicotine Tob Res 2016;18:130‑7.
)