Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Department of Management, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran,
2 Department of Management and Health Information Technology, School of Management and Medical Information, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences,
3 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The successful application of the information systems in the health‑care domain
requires a reasonable recognition of the factors affecting the acceptance and use of such systems.
The study aimed to investigate the factors affecting the acceptance and use of an integrated health
system (IHS) in Isfahan primary health centers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was an applied and descriptive–analytical survey conducted in
Isfahan, Iran. Research population included all IHS’s users in the health centers no. 1 and 2 of
Isfahan city from which a sample of 320 individuals were selected in total. Data were collected using a
questionnaire developed based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model.
Data were analyzed using partial least squares (PLS) method and SmartPLS software.
RESULTS: The users’ behavioral intention to use the IHS system was influenced by performance
expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence, but it was not significantly related to facilitating
conditions. Behavioral intention to use the IHS also had a significant relationship with the use of
system. Furthermore, performance expectancy was the most important predictor.
CONCLUSIONS: According to the findings, if the system users perceive the positive role of system
in performance improvement, its convenience to use, and positive attitude of others toward it, their
willingness to accept and use system will increase. Furthermore, it was important for the users that
the system helps them in resolving their daily work‑related problems and making rational decisions.
Keywords
- McGeorge NM, Hegde S, Guarrera TK, Zhou Y, Lin L, Crane PW,
et al. Studying the impact of interoperable electronic health records
on workflow in ambulatory care. Int J Ind Ergon 2015;49:144‑55.
2. Raymond L, Paré G, Marchand M. Extended use of electronic
health records by primary care physicians: Does the electronic
health record artefact matter? Health Informatics Journal
2017;00:1‑12.
3. News and Information Center of the Ministry of Health and
Medical Education. Integrated Health System (SIB) as Important
Plan of Primary Healthcare in 2016; 2016. Available from:
http://www.behdasht.gov.ir/?siteid=1&pageid=1508&newsvi
ew=142544. [Last accessed on 2017 Jul 13].
4. Importance of Electronic Health Record: Discussion with
Dr. Nasser Kalantari, Consultant of Deputy of Minister of Health.
Behvars 2016;2: 5‑13.
5. Regan EA, Wang J. Realizing the value of EHR systems:
Critical success factors. Trans Int Conf Health Inf Technol Adv
2015;3: 20‑36.
6. Kaplan B, Harris‑Salamone KD. Health IT success and failure:
Recommendations from literature and an AMIA workshop. J Am
Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:291‑9.
7. Sharifian R, Askarian F, Nematolahi M, Farhadi P. Factors
influencing nurses’ acceptance of hospital information systems
in Iran: Application of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use
of Technology. Health Inf Manag 2014;43:23‑8.
8. Cannon MD, Edmondson AC. Confronting failure: Antecedents
and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational
work groups. J Organ Behav 2001;22:161‑77.
9. Bajwa NK, Singh H, De KK. Critical success factors in electronic
health records (EHR) implementation: An exploratory study in
North India. Int J Healthc Inf Syst Inform 2017;12:1‑17.
10. Shahbahrami A, Moayed Rezaie S, Hafezi M. Effective factors in
acceptance of electronic health record from employees point of
view. J Guilan Univ Med Sci 2016;24:50‑60.
11. Maghsoudloo M, Abolhassani F, Lotfibakhshaiesh N. Connecting
primary health care: A comprehensive pilot study. Acta Med Iran
2016;54:441‑7.
12. Gagnon MP, Ghandour el K, Talla PK, Simonyan D, Godin G,
Labrecque M, et al. Electronic health record acceptance by
physicians: Testing an integrated theoretical model. J Biomed
Inform 2014;48:17‑27.
13. Joos D, Chen Q, Jirjis J, Johnson KB. An electronic medical record
in primary care: Impact on satisfaction, work efficiency and clinic
processes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006:394‑8.
14. Venkatesh V, Sykes TA, Zhang X, editors. ‘Just What the Doctor
Ordered’: A Revised UTAUT for EMR System Adoption and
Use by Doctors. System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii
International Conference on; 2011: IEEE; 2011.
15. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance
of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q
2003;27:425‑78.
16. Ifinedo P, editor. Technology Acceptance by Health Professionals
in Canada: An Analysis with a Modified UTAUT Model. System
Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on;
2012: IEEE; 2012.
17. Turan A, Tunç AÖ, Zehir C. A theoretical model proposal:
Personal innovativeness and user involvement as antecedents of
Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Procedia
Soc Behav Sci 2015;210:43‑51.
18. Doll WJ, Torkzadeh G. Developing a multidimensional
measure of system‑use in an organizational context. Inf Manage
1998;33:171‑85.
19. Nikabadi M, Naghipour N. A model for assessing hospital
information systems. J Health Adm 2015;18:50‑66. - 20. Scholl J, Syed‑Abdul S, Ahmed LA. A case study of an EMR
system at a large hospital in India: Challenges and strategies for
successful adoption. J Biomed Inform 2011;44:958‑67.
21. Hoque R, Sorwar G. Understanding factors influencing the
adoption of mHealth by the elderly: An extension of the UTAUT
model. Int J Med Inform 2017;101:75‑84.
22. Kijsanayotin B, Pannarunothai S, Speedie SM. Factors influencing
health information technology adoption in Thailand’s community
health centers: Applying the UTAUT model. Int J Med Inform
2009;78:404‑16.
23. Jahanbakhsh M, Nazemi Z. The Study of Factors Affecting
Adoption and Use of Picture Archiving and Communication
System at Ayatollah Kashani Hospital Using Unified Theory of
Acceptance and Use of Technology (Research Project). Isfahan,
Iran: Faculty of Management and Medical Information, Isfahan
University of Medical Sciences; 2015.
24. Goudarzvand Ghegini M, Esmaeili S. The study of organizational
culture associated with Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use
of Technology model in hospitals of rasht. J Payavard Salamat
2015;9:29‑42.
25. Holtz B, Krein S. Understanding nurse perceptions of a newly
implemented electronic medical record system. J Technol Hum
Serv 2011;29:247‑62.
26. Phichitchaisopa N, Naenna T. Factors affecting the adoption of
healthcare information technology. EXCLI J 2013;12:413‑36.
27. Zuiderwijk A, Janssen M, Dwivedi YK. Acceptance and use
predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the Unified
Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Gov Inf Q
2015;32:429‑40.
28. Love VD. Improving Electronic Health Record Adoption among
Rural Health‑Care Workers: A Correlational Study: Capella
University; 2015.
)