Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Academic self‑efficacy is the learners’ belief in their abilities in academic process.
Perception of the educational‑research environment is one of the effective factors on academic
self‑efficacy. The aim of this study was to examine the perception of educational‑research environment
and academic self‑efficacy in students of the University of Tehran in 2016.
METHODS: This cross‑sectional study was done on 385 students of Tehran University of Medical
Sciences. Samples were selected through stratified sampling method. Data were collected through
questionnaires of perception of educational‑research environment scale 24 and of academic
self‑efficacy scale 32 that reliability and validity of that were confirmed. Data analysis was performed
using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 25.31 (standard deviation [SD] = 3.94), and 56.1% of
them were female and the rest were male. The mean perception of educational‑research environment
was 65.79 (SD = 13.13), and the mean academic self‑efficacy was 107.44 (15.92). The Pearson’s
correlation test results showed that there was a statistically significant relationship between perception
of educational‑research environment with academic self‑efficacy (P = 0.001, r = 0.180).
CONCLUSION: There was a significant statistical relationship between perception of
educational‑research environment and academic self‑efficacy. Students who have high perception
of educational‑research environment are high academic self‑efficacy. Academic self‑efficacy can be
improved by improving perception of the educational‑research environment.

Keywords

  1. Zhang LF. Do thinking styles contribute to academic achievement
    beyond self‑rated abilities? J Psychol 2001;135:621‑37.
    2. Guay F, Vallerand RJ. Social context, student’s motivation, and
    academic achievement: Toward a process model. Soc Psychol
    Educ 1996;1:211‑33.
    3. Bassaw B, Roff S, McAleer S, Roopnarinesingh S, De Lisle J,
    Teelucksingh S, et al. Students’ perspectives on the educational
    environment, faculty of medical sciences, Trinidad. Med Teach
    2003;25:522‑6.
    4. Tokuda Y, Goto E, Otaki J, Jacobs J, Omata F, Obara H,
    et al. Undergraduate educational environment, perceived
    preparedness for postgraduate clinical training, and pass rate on
    the National Medical Licensure Examination in Japan. BMC Med
    Educ 2010;10:35.
    5. Whittle SR, Whelan B, Murdoch‑Eaton DG. DREEM and beyond;
    studies of the educational environment as a means for its
    enhancement. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2007;20:7.
    6. Zawawi AH, Elzubeir M. Using DREEM to compare graduating
    students’ perceptions of learning environments at medical
    schools adopting contrasting educational strategies. Med Teach
    2012;34 Suppl 1:S25‑31.
  2. 7. Kahn JH, Gelso CJ. Factor structure of the research training
    environment scale‑revised: Implications for research training in
    applied psychology. Couns Psychol 1997;25:22‑37.
    8. Rotthoff T, Ostapczuk MS, De Bruin J, Decking U, Schneider M,
    Ritz‑Timme S, et al. Assessing the learning environment of a
    faculty: Psychometric validation of the german version of the
    dundee ready education environment measure with students
    and teachers. Med Teach 2011;33:e624‑36.
    9. Mohd Said N, Rogayah J, Hafizah A. A study of learning
    environments in the Kulliyyah (faculty) of Nursing, International
    Islamic University Malaysia. Malays J Med Sci 2009;16:15‑24.
    10. Miles S, Leinster SJ. Medical students’ perceptions of their
    educational environment: Expected versus actual perceptions.
    Med Educ 2007;41:265‑72.
    11. Shehnaz SI, Sreedharan J. Students’ perceptions of educational
    environment in a medical school experiencing curricular
    transition in United Arab Emirates. Med Teach 2011;33:e37‑42.
    12. Genn JM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 1):
    Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical
    education‑a unifying perspective. Med Teach 2001;23:337‑44.
    13. Guilbert J. Educational Handbook for Training Health Personnel.
    Geneva: WHO Publications; 1991.
    14. Pajares F. Self‑efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Rev Educ Res
    1996;66:543‑78.
    15. Ching LC. Strategy and self‑regulation instruction as contributors
    to improving students’ cognitive model in an ESL program. Engl
    Specific Purposes 2002;21:261‑89.
    16. Jackson JW. Enhancing self‑efficacy and learning performance.
    J Exp Educ 2002;70:243‑54.
    17. Margolis H, McCabe P. Self‑efficacy: A key to improving the
    motivation of struggling learners. Preventing School Failure:
    Alternative Education for Children and Youth. 2003;47:162‑9.
    18. Bieschke KJ. Research self‑efficacy beliefs and research outcome
    expectations: Implications for developing scientifically minded
    psychologists. J Career Assess 2006;14:77‑91.
    19. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action.
    Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‑Hall; 1986.
    20. Garavand H, Kareshki H, Ahanchian MR. The role of
    educational‑research environment and social factors on the
    research self‑efficacy of students of Mashhad University of
    Medical Sciences. J Med Educ Dev 2014;8:31‑45.
    21. Ghadampour E, Garavand H, Sabzian S. The relationship between
    perception of educational‑research environment and research
    self‑efficacy and academic achievement of students of Mashhad
    University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ 2015;14:933‑42.
    22. Salami SO. Psychopathology and academic performance among
    Nigerian high school adolescents: The moderator effects of study
    behaviour, self‑efficacy and motivation. J Soc Sci 2008;16:155‑62.
    23. Jamali M, Noroozi A, Tahmasebi R. Factors affecting academic
    self‑efficacy and its association with academic achievment among
    students of Bushehr University Medical Sciences 2012‑13. Iran J
    Med Educ 2013;13:629‑41.
    24. Saadat S, Asghari F, Jazayeri R. The relationship between
    academic self‑efficacy with perceived stress, coping strategies
    and perceived social support among students of University of
    Guilan. Iran J Med Educ 2015;15:67‑78.
    25. Dreyer A, Gibbs A, Smalley S, Mlambo M, Pandya H. Clinical
    associate students’ perception of the educational environment at
    the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. Afr J Prim
    Health Care Fam Med. 2015; 7(1): 778.
    26. Rochmawati E, Rahayu GR, Kumara A. Educational environment
    and approaches to learning of undergraduate nursing students in
    an Indonesian school of nursing. Nurse Educ Pract 2014;14:729‑33.
    27. Andalib MM, Malekzadeh MM, Agharahimi Z, Daryabeigi M,
    Yaghmaei B, Ashrafi MR, et al. Evaluation of educational
    environment for medical students of a tertiary pediatric hospital in
    Tehran, using DREEM questionnaire. Iran J Pediatr 2015;25:e2362.
    28. SalehiM. Measure and the Effective Factors on the Self‑Efficacy and
    Research Motivation of Students According to Social‑Cognitive
    Theory of Bendora: Dissertation. Mashhad: Ferdowsi University
    of Mashhad; 2011.
    29. Balaram P. Research facilities. Curr Sci 2000;78:355‑6.
    30. Pajares F. Gender and perceived self‑efficacy in self‑regulated
    learning. Theory Pract 2002;41:116‑25.