Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Pediatrics, Melaka‑Manipal Medical College, Melaka, Malaysia

Abstract

CONTEXT: Scientific research not only promotes health and combats diseases of an individual,
but also it can strengthen the effectiveness of health systems. Hence, understanding of scientific
methods becomes a crucial component in the medical profession.
AIMS: This study was conducted to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and barriers toward research
among undergraduate medical and dental students.
SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This cross‑sectional study was conducted among 295 undergraduate
Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) and Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS)
students from a private medical college in Malaysia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We purposively selected 360 students attending the 3rd, 4th, and
5th year in MBBS course and BDS course in September 2015. A total of 295 students who were
willing to provide written informed consent were included in this study. We collected data using a
validated, self‑administered, structured questionnaire which included 20 questions about knowledge
toward scientific research, 21 attitude items in regard to scientific research, a list of 10 barriers toward
conducting medical research, and 5 questions of confidence to conduct the medical research.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent
t‑test, ANOVA, and multiple linear regression.
RESULTS: Among the students, 56.9% had moderate knowledge while the majority (83.3%) had
moderate attitude toward scientific research. The majorly cited barriers were the lack of time (79.9%),
lack of knowledge and skills (72.1%), lack of funding (72.0%) and facilities (63.6%), and lack of
rewards (55.8%). There was a significant association between age, academic year, and knowledge
of research as the older age group, and 4th‑ and 5th‑year students had higher knowledge score. The
students of higher attitude score had better‑perceived barriers score toward research with regression
coefficient 0.095 (95% confidence interval 0.032–0.159).
CONCLUSIONS: Even though the students had the positive attitudes toward scientific research, a
supportive and positive environment is needed to improve skills and knowledge of research and to
overcome the barriers toward the conduct of scientific research.

Keywords

1. Marczyk GR, Dematteo D, Festinger D. Essentials of Research
Design and Methodology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2005.
2. Amar‑Singh HS, Bakar AA, Sararaks S. The Medical Research
Handbook: Planning a Research Project. 1st ed. Perak: Clinical
Research Centre Perak (CRC Perak) and the Institute for Health
Systems Research (IHSR); 2008.
3. Hickson M. Research Handbook for Health Care Professionals.
1st ed. Oxford: Wiley‑Blackwell; 2008.
4. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO). UNESCO Science Report 2010: The Current Status
of Science around the World. Paris: United Nations Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization; 2010.
5. Goyal RC. Research Methodology for Health Professionals. 1st ed.
New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2013.
6. Khan H, Khan S, Iqbal A. Knowledge, attitudes and practices
around health research: The perspective of physicians‑in‑training
in Pakistan. BMC Med Educ 2009, 9:46. doi: 10.1186/1472‑6920‑9‑46.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2719622
7. Aslam F, Shakir M, Qayyum MA. Why medical students are
crucial to the future of research in South Asia. PLoS Med 2005,
2:e322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed. 0020322. http://journals.plos.
org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020322
8. Rash EM. A service learning research methods course. J Nurs
Educ 2005; 44:477‑478.
9. Amin TT, Kaliyadan F, Qattan EA, Majed MH, Khanjaf HA,
Mirza M. Knowledge, attitudes and barriers related to
participation of medical students in research in three Arab
Universities. Educ Med J 2012; 4:e43‑e56.
10. Khan H, Khawaja MR, Waheed A, Rauf MA, Fatmi Z. Knowledge
and attitudes about health research amongst a group of
Pakistani medical students. BMC Med Educ 2006, 6:54. doi:
10.1186/1472‑6920‑6‑54. https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.
com/articles/10.1186/1472‑6920‑6‑54.
11. Azizan SA. Strenghtening Malaysia’s scientific and technological
development through human capital development. Procedia Soc
Behav Sci 2013; 91:648‑653.
12. Cursiefen C, Altunbas A. Contribution of medical student research
to the medlineTM‑indexed publications of a German medical
faculty. Med Educ 1998; 32:439‑440.
13. Bonner A, Sando J. Examining the knowledge, attitude and use
of research by nurses. J Nurs Manag 2008; 16:334‑343.
14. Vodopivec I, Vujaklija A, Hrabak M, Lukić IK, Marusić A,
Marusić M, et al. Knowledge about and attitude towards science
of first year medical students. Croat Med J 2002; 43:58‑62.
15. Campisi J, Finn KE. Does active learning improve student’s
knowledge of and attitudes toward research methods? J Coll Sci
Teach 2011; 40:38‑45.
16. Burgoyne LN, O’Flynn S, Boylan GB. Undergraduate medical
research: The student perspective. Med Educ Online 2010, 15:5212.
doi: 10.3402/meo.v15i0.5212. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
pubmed/20844608.
17. Athanasakis E. Nurses’ research behaviour and barriers to
research utilization into clinical nursing practice: A close look.
Int J Caring Sci 2013; 6:16‑28.
18. Park SJ, Liang MM, Sherwin TT, McGhee CN. Completing an
intercalated research degree during medical undergraduate
training: Barriers, benefits and postgraduate career profiles. N Z
Med J 2010; 123:24‑33.
19. Al‑Shalawy FA, Haleem FA. A knowledge attitudes and perceived
barriers towards scientific research among undergraduate health
sciences students in the central province of Saudi Arabia. Educ
Med J 2015; 7:e16‑e21.
20. Teh LC, Prema M, Choy MP, Letchuman GR. Attitudes, barriers
and facilitators to the conduct of research in government hospitals:
A cross‑sectional study among specialists in government
hospitals, Northern states of Malaysia. Med J Malaysia 2017;
72:26‑31.
21. Yahui HC, Swaninathan N. Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers
towards evidence‑based practice among physiotherapists in
Malaysia. Hong Kong Physiother J 2017; 37:10‑18.
22. Rashid KA, Gomathy S, Manan A. The involvement of doctors
in research activities in two major hospitals in Penang Malaysia.
Malays J Public Health 2012; 12:31‑38.23. Birks M, Karen F, Chapman Y, Mills J, Porter J. Supporting the
evolution of a research culture among nurses in Malaysia. Aust
J Adv Nurs 2009; 27:89‑93.
24. Tan SY, Hatah E. Knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers
related to research utilization: A survey among pharmacists in
Malaysia. Int J Clin Pharm 2017; 39:450‑458.
25. Lwanga SK, Lemeshow S. Sample Size Determination in Health
Studies: A Practical Manual. Geneva: World Health Organization;
1991.
26. Manspeaker SA, Van Lunen BL, Turocy PS, Pribesh S,
Hankemeier D. Student knowledge, attitudes, and use of
evidence‑based concepts following an educational intervention.
Athl Train Educ J 2011; 6:88‑98.
27. Brown T, Tseng MH, Casey J, McDonald R, Lyons C. Predictors
of research utilization among pediatric occupational therapists.
OTJR Occup Particip Health 2010; 30:172‑183.
28. McClearyL, BrownGT. Association between nurses’ education about
research and their research use. Nurse Educ Today 2003; 23:556‑565.
29. Estabrooks CA. Modelling the individual determinants of research
utilization. West J Nurs Res 1999; 21:758‑772.
30. Birdsell J, Thornley R, Landry R, Estabrooks C, Mayan M. The
Utilization of Health Research Results in Alberta. Alberta: Alberta
Heritage Foundation for Medical Research; 2005.
31. Naing C, Wai VN, Durham J, Whittaker MA, Win NN, Aung K,
et al. A systematic review and meta‑analysis of medical students’
perspectives on the engagement in research. Medicine (Baltimore)
2015, 94:e1089. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001089. https://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617066.
32. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI).
Public Awareness of Science, Technology and Innovation,
Malaysia 2014. Putrajaya: Malaysia Science and Technology
Information Centre (MASTIC), Ministry of Science, Technology
and Innovation (MOSTI); 2014.
33. Ertmer P. Addressing first‑and second‑order barriers to change:
Strategies for technology integration. Educ Technol Res Dev 1999;
47:47‑61.