Journal of Education and Health Promotion

The comparative analysis of satisfaction rate among the public universities talented students with education and all the services provided to them

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

. Shaghayegh Nikneshan
. Nikoo Yamani 1
. Azam Moghadam 2
. Ahmadreza Nasr

1 Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan

2 Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Introduction: Universities provide different facilities for talented students. The aim of this research
was to comparatively examine the rate of satisfaction among the talented students with the services
offered to them at different Iranian universities. Methods: This was a survey study in which a
researcher-made questionnaire was used to collect the data. The statistical population of this
research consisted of all the talented students at four universities who had been admitted at these
universities from 2003 to 2009. Using the formula, the total number of samples was estimated to
be approximately 328. Results: The research findings indicated that the talented students did
not have satisfaction with the educational situation, and no statistically significant difference was
observed among the different universities with regard to this issue. Conclusion: According to the
findings it is suggested that universities offer more financial facilities for research, and attending
conferences, and provide rich-content and valuable classes, and active and creative teaching
methods. It is also proposed that educational workshops on detecting talented students and the
manner of dealing with them be convened for faculty members.

Keywords

Educational services
talented students
university
1. Westberg KL. Meeting the needs of the gifted in the regular
classroom. Gofted Child Today 1998;18:27-9.
2. Levy A. School curriculum. In: Mashayekh F, editor. Tehran:
Publication of the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance; 1367.
3. Nikneshan SH, Nasr Isfahani A, Mirshah Jafari A. The use of creative
teaching methods and creative characteristics of teachers. Stud
Educ Psychol 2010;136:145-64.
4. Karimi S, Nasr Isfahani A. Role of higher education in lifelong
learning. Educ Strateg J 2003;4:91-4.
5. Renzulli JS. A rising tide lifts all ships: Developing the gifts and
talents of all students. Phi Delta Kappan 1998;80:105-11.
6. Maleki H. Organization of curriculum content: With emphasis on
curriculum and social studies. Shiraz: Ghu Press; 1988.
7. Van Tassel-Baska J. Planning science programs for high-ability learners.
Available from: http://erices.Org/digests/e546.htm. [Last cited in 1998b].
8. Tomlinson CA. Good teaching for one and all: Does gifted education
have an instructional identity? J Educ Gift 1996;20:155-74.
9. Nelson J, Middleton CR. Activity based student’s induction,
motivation, performance and professional socialization: Acas study
International conference on engineering education. Oslo 2001;6-10.
10. Hoower SM, Sayler M, Feldhusen JF. Cluster grouping and elementary
students at the elementary level. Roeper Rev 1993;16:13-5.
11. Archambault F, Westberg X, Westerg KL, Brown S, Hallmark BW,
Zang W, et al. Regular classroom practices with gifted students: Findings
from the classroom practices survey. J Educ Gift 1993;16:103-19.
12. Johnsen S, Ryser G. Identification of young children from lower
incorme families. Gift Talent Int 1994;9:62-8.
13. Torrance EP. Torrance tests of creative thinking- revised.
Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service; 1974.
14. Gorey H. Creativity in the classroom. Gift Child Today Mag
1996;19:36-7.
15. Kerka L. Helping gifted students with stress management. Eric Ec
Digest Available from: www.kidsource.com. [Last cited in 1999].
16. Hosseini A. Effective teaching methods for the talented. Proceedings
of the second national conference for talented students, Isfahan,
Iran: Isfahan University; 2003.
17. Maker CJ. Teaching models in education of the gifted. Austin, TX:
Proed; 1982.
18. Parke B. Challenging gifted students in the regular classroom. Available
from: http://www.erices,org/digests/e513.htm. [Last cited in 1992].
19. Ahmadi A. The study of satisfaction of talented students at Isfahan
University. Proceedings of the national conference for talented
students, Isfahan, Iran: Isfahan University; 2003.
20. Mokhtari Pour M, Jamshidian R. Barriers to creativity in education
and research of talented students of Isfahan University. Proceedings
of the National Conference for Talented Students, Isfahan, Iran:
Isfahan University; 2003.
21. Nasrabadi B, Noroozi R. Fostering creativity in gifted students of
Isfahan University. Proceedings of the National Conference for
Talented Students, Isfahan, Iran: Isfahan University; 2003.
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
Volume 2, Issue 3
Summer 2012
Pages 1-7

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us