Context: Iran experiences a high rate of burns accompanied by painful consequences, death and a lot of disabilities. In order to reduce the burden of this injury, some strategies such as designing and implementation of registration systems are essential. Aims: The aim of this study was to compare National Burn Registry in America, England, Australia and Iran. Materials and Methods: This study was comparative‑descriptive in which data collected from the National Burn Registry of America, England, Australia and Iran studied in 2013. The study population included National Burn Registry of these countries and data was collected using raw data forms. Statistical Analysis Used: Data on each country was categorized according to objectives and comparisons took place using comparative tables. Finally, descriptive‑theoretical analysis of the findings was performed. Results: National Security Agency and National Burn Repository in America, National Institute of Health and the Ministry of Health in England and the Department of Health and Senior in Australia are responsible for national burning registry. A seven‑axial model was proposed for Iran’s National Registry. America’s registry system is broader than other countries due to its cooperation with Canada, Sweden and Asia. Conclusion: The aim of the Burn Registry System is to gather, store, edit, categorize, analyze and distribute all burns, injured data from all health care centers in a specific population and provide valuable information about the occurrence, time and regional distribution of burn injury.
Definition burn. Available from: http://www.savaneh.mui.ac.ir/‑‑am oozesh‑897/‑amoozesh‑879.html. [Last accessed on 2013 Jun 14]. 2. Olaitan PB, Olaitan JO. Burns and scalds– Epidemiology and prevention in a developing country. Niger J Med 2005;14:9‑16. 3. Alaghehbandan R, Rossignol AM, Rastegar Lari A. Pediatric burn injuries in Tehran, Iran. Burns 2000;27:28‑32. 4. Anlatici R, Ozerdem OR, Dalay C, Kesiktaş E, Acartürk S, Seydaoğlu G. A retrospective analysis of 1083 Turkish patients with serious burns. Part 2: Burn care, survival and mortality. Burns 2002;28:239‑43.
5. Ansari‑Lari M, Askarian M. Epidemiology of burns presenting to an emergency department in Shiraz, South Iran. Burns 2003;29:579‑81. 6. Koushyar H, Amouzgar M, Shakeri M. The epidemiology of burns in Mashhad Imam Reza Burn Center (MIRBC). Horizon Med Sci 2004;10:43‑50. 7. Hegger J, Linares HA, Edgar P, Villarreal C. Treatment of infection in burn. In: Hern DN, editor. Total Burns Care. London: WB Saunders Company; 1998. p. 98‑135. 8. Meyer WJ, Blakeney P, Russell W, Thomas C, Robert R, Berniger F, et al. Psychological problems reported by young adults who were burned as children. J Burn Care Rehabil 2004;25:98‑106. 9. Johns ML. Health Information Management Technology: An Applied Approach. Chicago: American Health Information Management Association; 2002. p. 140‑51. 10. Rastegar Lari A, Alaghehbaanan R, Nikui R. An epidemiological study of 3341 burn patients during 3 years in Tehran, Iran. Burns 2001;27:115‑8. 11. Jahanbakhsh M. A comparative study for hospital diabet registry in the selected countries and designing a model for Iran [Thesis]. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences; 2005. 12. Davis N, Lacour M. Introduction to Health Information Technology. I st ed. United States: W. B. Saunders Company; 2002. 13. Abdelhak M, Grostick S, Hanken MA, Jacobs E, editors. Health Information Management of a Strategic Resource. 2nd ed. United States: W.B Saunders Company; 2001. 14. Ahmadi M. A comparative study of national systems of classification measures in selected countries [Thesis]. Tehran: Tehran University of Medical Sciences; 2003. 15. Tadayon H. Comparative study of national registry of acute coronary syndrome in selected countries and presenting appropriate guidelines for Iran. Isfahan: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services; 2010. 16. Saddoughi F. A comparative study for national cancer registry system in United Kingdom, Denmark, Malaysia and Iran and designing a model for Iran. Tehran: Iran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services; 2003. 17. Zohoor A, Asadi F. Suggesting a national trauma registry system for Iran. Iran Univ Med Sci J 2005;12:349‑56. 18. Lotf‑NeJad‑Afshar H, Zareh‑Fazlollahi Z, Khoshkalam M, Rezaei‑Hacheso P. Comparative study of mental health registry system of United Kingdom, Malaysia and Iran. Health Inf Manage 2009;6:1‑10. 19. Esmaeli‑Ghayoumabadi M. Comparative study of minimum data sets of health information management of organs transplantation in selected countries and presenting appropriate solution for Iran. Isfahan: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services; 2010. 20. Ajami S, Ebady‑fard‑azar F, Tofighi Sh, Bashardost N. A comparative survey on mortality information management systems (MIMS) in England, United States of America and NewZealand and proposing a suitable MIMS model for Iran. J Qazvin Univ Med Sci 2004;8:80‑88. 21. Aghakhani N, Rahbar N, Feizi A, Karimi H, Shoar NV. Epidemiology of hospitalized patients in burn ward of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Urmia (2005). J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci 2008;12:140‑150. 22. Johns ML. Health Information Management Technology: An Applied Approach. Chicago: American Health Information Management Association; April 2002. 23. Abdelhak M, Grostick S, Hanken MA, Jacobs E. Health Information: Management of a Strategic Resource. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 2001. p. 264. 24. Chin SP, Jeyaindran S, Azhari R, Wan Azman WA, Omar I, Robaayah Z, et al. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) registry– Leading the charge for National Cardiovascular Disease (NCVD) Database. Med J Malaysia 2008;63 Suppl C: 29‑36. 25. National burn repository. Available from: http://www.ameriburn. org/NBR.php. [Last accessed 2013 Sep 5]. 26. National burn care review. Available from: http://www. britishburnassociation.org. [Last accessed 2013 Aug 15]. 27. Watterson D, Gabbe BJ, Cleland H, Edgar D, Cameron P, Bates D, et al. Developing the first Bi‑National clinical quality registry for burns‑‑lessons learned so far. Burns. 2012;38:52‑60. 28. Asadi F. Comparative study of trauma registry system in selected countries. Manage Med Inf Sci 2004;7:26‑35. 29. Sadughi F, Zohoor A, Ebadi A. A suitable model for national cancer registry system of Iran. Manage Med Inf Sci 2004;7:3‑15. 30. Farzi J. Suggesting a national diabetes registry system for Iran. Manage Med Inf Sci 2004;7:45‑52. 31. Official coding guidelines. Available from: http://www.eicd.com/ guidelines/default.htm. [Last accessed 2013 Aug 25].
Sima Ajami,.. and Parisa Lamoochi,.. (2014). Comparative study on National Burn Registry in America, England, Australia and Iran. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 4(5), 1-5.
MLA
Sima Ajami,.. , and Parisa Lamoochi,.. . "Comparative study on National Burn Registry in America, England, Australia and Iran", Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 4, 5, 2014, 1-5.
HARVARD
Sima Ajami .., Parisa Lamoochi .. (2014). 'Comparative study on National Burn Registry in America, England, Australia and Iran', Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 4(5), pp. 1-5.
CHICAGO
.. Sima Ajami and .. Parisa Lamoochi, "Comparative study on National Burn Registry in America, England, Australia and Iran," Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 4 5 (2014): 1-5,
VANCOUVER
Sima Ajami .., Parisa Lamoochi .. Comparative study on National Burn Registry in America, England, Australia and Iran. J Educ Health Promot, 2014; 4(5): 1-5.