Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Abstract
Background: The advent of internet has triggered a growth in provision of more interactive
health promotion messages, which are likely to enhance the potential for behavior change
especially among children. We intended to find out the determinants and prevalence of use
of internet among school students of Puducherry. Materials and Methods: An exploratory
study was carried out among all the students belonging to the standards VI to IX (n = 421) in
three schools from urban areas and two schools from rural areas of Puducherry. A pretested,
self-administered questionnaire which sought information on sociodemographic details (age,
gender, standard of education, occupation of father, and type of school), use of internet, and
place of accessing internet, hours of use, and reasons for use was utilized. The statistical
significance between the categorical variables was done using chi-square test. All significance
tests were two-tailed and statistical significance was defined as a value of P < 0.05. Results:
Majority (72.2%) were boys. Less than one-third (23.8%) of the students used internet. The
use of internet was found to be significantly higher in mid-adolescents (Adjusted OR: 2.205);
among boys (Adjusted OR: 3.835) and students from urban areas (Adjusted OR: 4.694).
Conclusion: There is a geographical and gender divide observed among the school children
in the use of internet. Taking the steps to bridging the digital divide will help utilize internet as
a media for health promotion.
Keywords
leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Washington,
DC: Pew Internet and American Life; 2007. Available from: http://
www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/162/report_display.asp. [Last accessed
on 2012 July 27].
2. Ray M, Jat KR. Effect of electronic media on children. Indian Pediatr
2010; 47:561-8. 3. The Digital Divide, ICT and the 50x15 Initiative. [Internet] Internet
World Stats. Available from: http://www.internetworldstats.com/
links10.htm. [Last accessed on 2012 Nov 21].
4. Understanding the digital divide. OCED 2001. Available from: http://
www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/57/1888451.pdf. [Last cited on 2012
June 16].
5. Ritterband L, Gonder-frederick LA, Cox DJ, Clifton AD, West RW,
Borowitz S. Internet interventions: In review, in use, and into the
future. Prof Psychol Res Pract 2003;34:527-34.
6. DeBell M, Chapman C. Computer and Internet Use by Students in
2003. Statistical Analysis Report. Washington DC: Institute of
Education Sciences; 2006. Available from: http://nces.ed.gov/
pubs2006/2006065.pdf. [Last accessed on 2012 June 16].
7 Health and Behavior: The Interplay of Biological, Behavioral, and
Societal Influences. Washington DC: National Academies Press;
2001.
8. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS. A meta-analysis of computertailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med
2010;51:214-21.
)