Document Type : Original Article
Author
Abstract
Background: Evaluation of fund of knowledge about SLD among kindergarten and primary school
teachers is essential to avoid misdiagnosis of SLD and to plan for specific teacher education to
enable early identification of SLD among children. Aim: To assess the knowledge of learning
disability among primary school teachers in India and to investigate its psychometric properties.
Materials and Methods: An observational study was carried out 34 primary school teachers from
2 different schools in Puducherry town agreed to participate in this study with informed consent.
We used a multiple choice questionnaire format with a total of 50 questions, 5 choices for each
question and a total score of 50. The study was held at the schools where these teachers were
employed using pen and paper testing method and data were entered into the computer for
statistical analysis. Statistical Analysis: Total scores on the questionnaire of all teachers were
calculated. Content validity, reliability coefficient, discrimination factor, and facility factor were
analyzed using SPSS software. Results: 29% of the questions were correctly answered by all
34 teachers. The mean total score for this sample was 14.50 ± 9 and total item score for the 50
items was 9.90 ± 4. Cronbach’s (α) reliability was 0.89. Overall discrimination index was + 0.2 and
facility factor analysis score was 0.26. Conclusions: Validation of this new screening questionnaire
was successful in Indian setting. It has to be used in other settings to extrapolate our findings.
Keywords
statistical manual of mental disorder‑text revision (DSM IV TR).
Washington, D.C.: APA; 2000.
2. Elliot A, Hall N. The impact of Self‑Regulatory Teaching Strategies on
‘AT‑Risk’ Preschoolers’ Mathematical Learning in a Computer‑Mediated
Environment. J Comput Childhood Educ 1997;8:187‑98.
3. Bronfenbrenner U, Ceci SJ. Nature‑nurture reconceptualized in
developmental perspective: A bioecological model. Psychol Rev
1994;101:568‑86.
4. Learning disabilities in India: Willing the mind to learn. In: Karanth P,
Rozario J, editors. New Delhi: Sage Publications; 2003. p. 17‑29.
5. Jain R, ‘Lok Jumish: Alternate models of education’, Unpublished
Research Study. Mumbai: Tata Institute of Social Science; 2004.
6. Getting children back to school: Case studies in primary education.
Ramachandran V, editors. New Delhi: Sage Publications; 2007.
7. Mumbai: Authors. UNICEF and Amravati Zilla Parishad, Primary
Education Division, Maharashtra. Ananddayee Prakalap (Amravati):
Amravati zillyatil Ananddayee Prathmik Shikshan; 1997.
8. Pritchard VE, Clark CA, Liberty K, Champion PR, Wilson K,
Woodward LJ. Early school‑based learning difficulties in children
born very preterm. Early Hum Dev 2009;85:215‑24.
9. Souroulla AV, Panayiotou G, Kokkinos CM. The role of the teacher
in identifying learning disabilities: A study using the McCarney
Learning Disability Evaluation Scale (LDES). J Learn Disabil
2009;42:483‑93.
10. Considine J, Botti M, Thomas S. Design, format, validity and
reliability of multiple choice questions for use in nursing research
and education. Collegian 2005;12:19‑24.
11. Robinson TN. Teacher’s knowledge and misconceptions
concerning ADHD, learning disabilities and childhood depression: A
comparative study between Estonia and Norway. Estonia: University
of Tartu, Department of psychology; 2000. p. 1-40.
12. Bar‑Tikva H. Teachers with learning disabilities: Identifying the
professional self by analysing the autobiographic story and the
reflective feedback on practice. Thesis (Doctor of Education (EdD)).
University of Bath; 2008. p. 1‑148.
)