Journal of Education and Health Promotion

The evaluation of Mothers’ participation project in children’s growth and development process: Using the CIPP evaluation model

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

. Behzad Shams 1
. Parasto Golshiri 2
. Arash Najimi 3

1 Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine Child Health Promotion Research Center

2 Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine

3 Department of Health education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract
Background: Assessment of national children’s growth indicated a high prevalence of growth
failure among them. Many previous projects have studied the children’s growth and nutrition
status; but most of them leave it without evaluation. The aim of this study was to evaluate Mothers’
Participation Project that carried out in Isfahan after passing two years. Materials and Methods:
In this descriptive and summative evaluation study, 90 mother and child pairs were enrolled. They
were studied in two case and control groups. We used CIPP Evaluation Model (Context, Input,
Process, Product). Data collected using children growth chart and questionnaire was used in
the project. Obtained data were analyzed by nonparametric statistical tests. Results: The results
showed significant differences between the two groups in following items; mean of maternal
self-esteem (P < 0.001), maternal performance in training others (P = 0.006), weekly study
time (P = 0.004), frequency of mothers participation in education programs (P = 0.002), their
knowledge about the growth monitoring card (P = 0.03), their ability in drawing growth curves
(P < 0.001), mothers knowledge about types of growth curves (P = 0.001) and the objectives
of growth monitoring (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Considering the sustained improvement of
maternal knowledge and function regarding children’s growth and development after two years
of participation in the project, the performance of CIPP model was confirmed in this field.

Keywords

Children’s growth
CIPP evaluation models
evaluation
education
mothers’ participation
1. Bronte-Tinkew J, DeJong G. Children’s nutrition in Jamaica: Do
household structure and household economic resources matter?
Soc Sci Med 2004;58:499-514.
2. Kelly JM, Osamba B, Garg RM, Hamel MJ, Lewis JJ, Rowe SY, et
al. Community health worker performance in the management of
multiple childhood illnesses: Siaya District, Kenya, 1997-2001. Am
J Public Health 2001;91:1617-24.
3. Bang AT, Reddy HM, Deshmukh MD, Baitule SB, Bang RA.
Neonatal and infant mortality in the ten years (1993 to 2003) of the
Gadchiroli field trial: Effect of home-based neonatal care. J Perinatol
2005;25Suppl 1:S92-107.
4. Osrin D, Mesko N, Shrestha BP, Shrestha D, Tamang S, Thapa S ,et
al. Implementing a community-based participatory intervention to
improve essential newborn care in rural Nepal. Trans R Soc Trop
Med Hyg 2003;97:18-21.
5. Ayatollahi SM, Ahmadi K. Infants’ growth charts for southern Iran.
Ann Hum Biol 2001;28:337-45.
6. Anonymous. Nutrition of Children in Iran Provinces. Ministry of
Health, Treatment and Medical Education. Health Deputy of Nutrition
Department, with cooperation of UNICEF, 1998.
7. Authors. View of Child Nutrition in the provinces. Ministry of Health.
Health Department Nutrition with cooperation the United Nations
Children’s, 1994.
8. Travis P, Bennett S, Haines A, Pang T, Bhutta Z, Hyder AA, et al.
Overcoming health-systems constraints to achieve the Millennium
Development Goals. Lancet 2004;364:900-6.
9. Stufflebeam D. The CIPP model for evaluation. Evaluation in
Education and Human Services 2002;49:279-317.
10. Shams BG. Presenting a model for improvement of nutrition and
growth promotion of children by the CIPP Evaluation Model in
Isfahan. Iranian J Pediatr2004;15:221-8.
11. Shams B, Golshiri P, Zamani AR, Pourabdian S. Mothers’Participation in Improving Growth and Nutrition of the Children:
A Model for Community Participation. Iranian J Publ Health
2008;37:24-31.
12. Roemer MI. Montoya-Aguilar C. Quality assessment and assurance
in primary health care. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health
Organization; 1998. p. 23-51.
13. Black RE, Morris SS, Bryce J. Where and why are 10 million children
dying every year? Lancet 2003;361:2226-34.
14. Rosato M, Laverack G, Grabman LH, Tripathy P, Nair N, Mwansambo
C, et al. Community participation: Lessons for maternal, newborn,
and child health. Lancet 2008;372:962-71.
15. Bhuiya A, Yasmin F, BegUm F, Rob U. Community participation
in health, family planning and development activities a review of
international experiences. Bangladesh: The population council;
1996. p. 1-35.
16. Shure MB. I can problem solve: An interpersonal cognitive problem
solving program. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Research Press: 2001. p.
1-12
17. Manandhar DS, Osrin D, Shrestha BP, Mesko N, Morrison J,
Tumbahangphe KM, et al. Effect of a participatory intervention with
women’s groups on birth outcomes in Nepal: Cluster-randomised
controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:970-9.
18. Winichagoon P. Prevention and control of anemia: Thailand
experiences. J Nutr 2002; 1324(Suppl):862S-6S.
19. Bhandari N, Bahl R, Mazumdar S, Martines J, Black RE, Bhan MK, et
al. Effect of community-based promotion of exclusive breastfeeding
on diarrhoeal illness and growth: A cluster randomised controlled
trial. Lancet 2003;361:1418-23.
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
Volume 3, Issue 4
April 2013
Pages 1-5

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us