Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Abstract
Introduction: with due attention to the importance of learning disabilities and necessity
of presenting interventions for improvement of these disorders in order to prevent future
problems, this study used meta‑analysis of the research model on the impact of psychological
and educational interventions to improve academic performance of students with learning
disabilities. Methods: with the use of meta‑analysis method by integrating the results of various
researches, this study specifies the effect of psychological and educational interventions. In
this order, 57 studies, which their methodology was accepted, were selected and meta‑analysis
was performed on them. The research instrument was a meta‑analysis checklist. Results: The
effect size for the effectiveness of psychological‑educational interventions on improving the
academic performance of students with mathematics disorder (0.57), impaired writing (0.50)
and dyslexia (0.55) were reported. Conclusions: The result of meta‑analysis showed that
according to Cohen’s table, the effect size is above average, and it can be said that educational
and psychological interventions improve the academic performance of students with learning
disabilities.
Keywords
of Mental Disorders Text Revised. 4th ed. Translation of Nikkho M,
Pakavadays H. Tehran: Publications of Sokhan;2006.
2. Kaplan S. Synopsis of psychiatry: Behavioral sciences, clinical
psychiatry. Poorafkary N. (Persian Translator). Tehran: Mad; 2003.
3. Narimani M, Rajabi S. Survey of prevalence and causes of learning
disorders in primary school students in Ardabil Province. J Res Area
Except Child 2005; 5:231‑252.
4. Ahadi H, Kakavand AR. Learning disorders (theory and practice) and
academic learning with practical solutions to common problems.
Tehran: Arasbaran Pub.; 2010.
5. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. Responsiveness
to intervention and learning disabilities, 2005. Available from: http://
www.ldonline.org/?module=uploads and func=download and
fileId=461 [Last accessed on 2015 Apr 09].
6. Oraizi HR, Abedi A. Compared the effectiveness of teaching math
methods to elementary school students with learning disabilities.
J Educ Innov 2004; 3:8.
7. Yavari M, Yaryari F, Rastgarpur H. The utility of a computer‑assisted
instructional software (Hesabyar) for teaching mathematics to
students with dyscalculia. Res Except Child 2006; 6:713‑734.
8. Hamid N. Investigate the mathematic disorder in the male and
female students in Tehran and effectiveness of functional training,
economy token and muscle relaxation to reduce their mathematical
disorder. Shahid Chamran University. J Educ Psychol 2006; 13 (2):
119‑136.
9. Estaki M, Ashayeri H, Borjali A, Tabrizi M, Delavar A. Compare the
effectiveness of two methods of training both brain hemispheres
and music education In Improve the performance of girl student
with dyscalculia. Res Except Child 2007; 7:425‑448.
10. Reisi M. Effectiveness of cognitive‑behavioral treatment on
mathematical problem solving fifth grade female students in Yazd.
University of Esfahan; 2008.
11. Mohamadi F, Karami J, Bairami M. Evaluation of Effectiveness
of task‑process approach to the treatment of learning disabilities
mathematics. J Univ Tabriz 2008; 10:107‑129.
12. Chamanabad AG, Garusi Farshi M, Ashayeri H, Babapur J,
Moghimi A. Effects of training rhythmic movements of the
exercise on number memory function of students with learning
disorders. J Educ Psychol Stud Ferdowsi Univ Mashhad 2008;
25:149‑165.
13. Ghaziasgar N, Malekpur M, Molavi H, Amiri S. The effect of stress
inoculation training on anxiety and math performance of female
students with mathematical disability. Res Except Child 2010;
9:309‑320.
14. Rezaei M. Effectiveness teaching mathematics based on Gardner’s
multiple intelligences on student academic performance in third
grade daughter with math. Disabilities in Isfahan. University of
Esfahan; 2009.
15. Golparvar F, Mirnasab M, Fathiazar E. Effect of self‑monitoring
training of attention on math problem solving performance of male
students in fourth primary school with math disability. J of Appl
Psychol 2010; 3:41‑54.
16. Abedi A, Aghababai S. Effectiveness of working memory training on
the performance of children with mathematical learning disability.
J Clin Psychol 2010; 2:73‑81.
17. Moghadam K, Esteki M, Saadat M, KoshkiS. Effect of training painting
and pottery on improvement skills of visual perception‑spatial and
visual memory in students with accounts problems. Iran J Except
Child 2011; 11:24‑39.
18. Abedi A. Investigation of effectiveness of neuropsychological
interventions for improving academic performance of children with
mathematics learning disability. Adv Cogn Sci 2010; 12:1‑16.
19. Khodami N, Abedi A, Atashpur A. Effectiveness executive functions
education on improving the academic performance of students with
learning disabilities in mathematics. J New Findings Psychol 2010;
5:63‑77.
20. Kargar Shurki GH, Malekpur M, Ahmadi GH. Efficacy of fine motor
skills education on learning mathematical concepts in children with
mathematical disorder in third grade to fifth in Meybod. J Leadership
Manage Educ Islamic Azad Univ Garmsar 2010; 4:105‑126.
21. Moghadam K, Esteki M, Pishyareh E, Farahbod M, Gharib M. Effectof training visual arts on visual perceptual skills students accounts
insufficient. Spec Issue Rehabil Neurol Child 2010; 11:25‑40.
22. Khodami N, Abedi A, Atashpur A. The effect of working memory and
metacognition and metacognition training on academic function of
female students with mathematics learning disabilities. Knowl Res
Appl Psychol 2011; 1:45‑53.
23. Tafti EA. The effectiveness of sensory, motor and educational
combined intervention on the degree of gifred male students
mathematical learning disorder in the Forth Grade of Elementary
Schools in the City of Yazd. University of Esfahan; 2011.
24. Yarmohamadian A, Asliazad M. Effects of metacognition training
on the improvement of mathematical function in children with
mathematic learning disability. Adv Cogn Sci 2012; 14:41‑52.
25. Amani M, Barahmand O, Narimani M. An examination of the
effectiveness of neuropsychological and content‑based training
methods in the remediation of mathematics disorder. J Learn Disabil
2012; 1:6‑12.
26. Abedi A, Ghaderi Najafabadi M, Shushtari M, Golshani F.
Effectiveness of Panoura and Philipou metacognition training on
improve the problem solving performance and metacognitive skills
of students with specific deficits in mathematical. J Psychol Except
Individ 2012; 2:125‑145.
27. MirMahdi SR, Alizadeh H, Saif Naraghi M. Training of executive
functions in mathematics and reading performance of elementary
school students with specific learning disability. Res Except Child
2009; 9:1‑12.
28. Zarbakhsh MR. Effect of multisensory teaching methods Orton on
second and third grade students reading disorder. University of
Isfahan; 2010.
29. Baezat F, Jamali SH, Moazami D. Effects of neuropsychological
treatm on the reading efficiency of Iranian students with
developmental dyslexia of linguistic type. Psychol Stud 2006;
2:107‑124.
30. Asgari R, Yaryari F, Kadivar P. Application of educational software
based on neuropsychological color vision models for teaching
dyslexic students. Res Except Child 2007; 2:187‑210.
31. Zianivand M. Comparison effectiveness of multisensory approach
Fernald and Orton on the reading performance of third grade
elementary school boys Dyslexia. University of Isfahan; 2008.
32. Bahari GH, Naraghi MS. The efficacy of the Sina training in reduci
errors of dyslexic children. J Iran Psychol, 2008; 16:343‑353.
33. Jabari S, Khademi M. A comparison of methods for teaching reading
comprehension with traditional methods forerunner of modern
cognitive comprehension of fourth grade students and five children
with reading problems, and without reading problems. J Shiraz Univ
Educ Stud Learn 2009; 57:2‑19.
34. Arjmandnia A, Naraghi MS. Effect of rehearsal on working memory
performance in dyslexic students. J Behav Sci 2009; 3:173‑188.
35. Majidi A, Danesh E, Khosh‑Konesh A. Effect of self‑instruction
technic on reduction reading difficuits and reduction depression
elementary school students with dyslexia. Daneshvar (Raftar) Clin
Psychol Pers 2009; 17:11‑8.
36. Siahkalrudi LS, Alizadeh H, Kushesh MR. The impact of visual
reception skills training on reading performance in students with
dyslexia. Adv Cogn Sci 2009; 11:63‑72.
37. Heidari T. The effect of Davis methods on the reading performance
and self concept children’s with dyslexia. University of Isfahan;
2010.
38. Gharai M. Effect of Orton multi‑sensory teaching method Everton
on reading performance of third‑and fourth‑grade female students
in public schools in Isfahan. University of Isfahan; 2010.
39. Alilesar SS. Effectiveness of Gardner’s multiple intelligences training
on reading performance of third grade students with dyslexia in
Isfahan. University of Isfahan; 2010.
40. Gheisari Z. The effect of cognitive behavior play therapy on the
correct reading performance of elementary school students with
dyslexia in second and third grade in Hamedan. Payam Noor
University of Tehran; 2010.
41. Haghighatzadeh R . E f f e c t s o f c o m b i n e d t r a i n i n g ,
sensory‑motor‑perceptual reading performance of elementary
students with dyslexia in Isfashan. University of Isfahan; 2011.
42. Zaghian M. Effectiveness of working memory training on
improvement improves reading performance of third grade students
with reading disabilities. University of Isfahan; 2011.
43. Alipur A, Kari Narkadeh T, Zandi B, Yazdanfar M. Effect of
phonological awareness Training on phonological awareness
abilities, non‑word reading and reading speed in dyslexic boys.
Iran J Except Child 2011; 11:343‑352.
44. Fard SF, Manie FM. Effectiveness of teaching methods‑correction
based on phonological processing model on speed and accuracy
of reading elementary school students with dyslexia. Res Except
Child 2010; 10:269‑282.
45. Vatandust N. Effectiveness of auditory perceptual training on reading
performance of dyslexic students in third grade of Khomeini Shahr.
University of Isfahan; 2010.
46. Ghobari‑Bonab B, Afruz GH, Zadeh SH, Bakhshi J, Pirzadi H.
Impact of the teaching active thinking‑oriented strategies and self
monitoring on realing comprehension of students with the reading
difficulties. J Learn Disabil 2012; 2:77‑97.
47. Givi HG, Narimani M, Mahmoodi H. The effectiveness of
cognition‑promoting software on executive functions, response
inhibition and working memory of children with dyslexia and
attention deficit hyperactivity. J Learn Disabil 2012; 1:98‑115.
48. Narimani M, Abolghasemi A, Rajab S, Nazari M, Zahed A. The impact
of EEG neurobiofeedback on dyslexia symptoms. Iran J Except Child
2012; 12:21‑34.
49. Dehghani Firuz Abadi MD. Compare the effectiveness of
metacognitive strategies and training documents on comprehension
elementary students dyslexia. University of Isfahan; 2007.
50. Musavi AH. The effectiveness of method of combine phonemes
teaching on dyslexia correction and dysgraphia in second and
third grade students of elementary schools in the city of Shahriar
2008‑2009. Allameh Tabatabai University; 2009.
51. Honjani E. The effectiveness of the training of accuracy on ability
of dictation of elementary students with learning disabilities in the
city of Isfahan; 2007.
52. Dorkhani Z, Kagbaf M, Molavi H, Amiri Sh. A comparison of the
effect of process training and task‑process training methods on
spelling performance in elementary school students. Res Except
Child 2009; 9:2.
53. Baezat F, Izadifard R. Effectiveness self regulation to reduce spelling
errors of students with writing disorders. Res Except Child 2009;
1:21‑8.
54. Bahrami F, Adamzadeh F, Mokhtari S. Educational methods of
written expression on students with learning disorder in primary
schools. Iran J Except Child 2009; 11:23‑32.
55. Mansurnejad Z. The effectiveness of fernald sensory integration
method on dysgraphia and dictation in second. University of
Esfahan; 2009.
56. Baezat F. Role of word processing with self‑question strategies in
improving spelling problems in third primary school students with
writing disorder. J Appl Psychol 2009; 2:58‑71.
57. Malekian F, Akhondi A. The effect of multimedia teaching on
improving spelling disorder of special students learning. J New
Ideas Educative Sci 2010; 6:145‑162.
58. Heidari AR, Hafezi F, Tahankar Dezfuli M. Evaluation and comparison
multi‑sensory therapy of fernald and perceptual‑motor of Kepart
on reducing impaired students with writing disorders. New Find
Psychol, 2010; 4 (12):65‑78.
59. Baezzat F, Naderi H, Eizadifar R. Effect of phonological awareness
training package on reduction of spilling errors of primary school
student whit writing disorder. J Behav Sci 2012; 6:55‑60.
60. Karimi B, Alizadeh H, Farohki N, Sadipoor E. The comparision of the
effectiveness of direct instruction, phonological awareness and the
combined method on the reduction of elementary student spelling
problem. Iran J Except Child 2011; 11:255‑267.
61. Farahani H, Oraizi HR. Advanced methods in humanities. Isfahan:
University Jahad Unit of Isfahan; 2005.62. Delavar A. Theoretical and practical research in the humanities and
social sciences. Tehran: Roshd Pub.; 2009.
63. Hovit D, Keramer D. In: Sharifi HP, Najafizadeh J, Mirhashemi M,
Manavipur, D, Sharifi N, editors. Statistical methods in psychology
and other behavioral sciences. Tehran, Sokhan Pub.; 2009.
64. Martins A. Ramalho N. Morin E. A comprehensive meta‑analysis
of the relationship between Emotional Intelligence and health. J of
Personality and Individual Differences. 2010;49, 554–564.
65. Becker W, Carnine D. Direct instruction: A behavior theory
model for comprehensive educational intervention with
the disadvantaged. In: Bijou SW, Ruiz R, editors. Behavior
Modification: Contributions to Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates; 1981.
66. Swanson HL, Hoskyn M. Experimental intervention research on
students with learning disabilities: A meta‑analysis of treatment
outcomes. Rev Educ Res 1998; 68:277‑321.
67. Kakaee A. The effectiveness of multisensory teaching method on
improvement reading disorder of second and third grade students
in Ilam. University of Alzahra; 2002.
68. Zito JR, Adkins M, Gavins M, Harris KR, Graham S. Self‑regulated
strategy development: Relationship to the social cognitive
perspective and the development of self‑regulation. Reading and
Writing Qua; 2007.
69. Pintrich P. The role of goal orientation in self‑ regulated learning.
In: Boekaerts M, Pintrich P, Zeidner M, editors. Handbook of Self
regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2000;452‑501.
70. Zimmerman B. Attaining self‑regulated learning: A social‑cognitive
perspective. InM. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, and M. Zeidner(eds). Handbook
of Self‑Regulation, 2000; 452‑501. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
71. Line KL, Harris KR, Graham S, Weisenbach JL, Bridle M, Morphey P.
The effect of self‑regulated strategy development on the writing
performance of second‑grade students with behavioral and writing
difficulties. J Spec Educ 2008; 41:234‑253.
72. Graham S, Harris KR. Writing Better. Effective Strategies for
Teaching Students with Learning Difficulties. Baltimore: Paul. H.
Brooks Publishing Co.; 2005.
73. Santangelo T, Harris KR, Graham S. Using self‑regulated strategy
development to support students who have ‘trouble gitting thanks
into werds. Remedial Spec Educ 2008; 29:78‑89.
74. Torres‑Femandes D. Gender differences in working memory and
phonological awareness [Dissertation]. Capella University; 2008.
75. Gillon GT. Phonological Awareness: Form Research to Practice.
New York: The Guilford Press; 2004.
76. Kamhi A, Hinton LN. Explaining individual differences in spelling
ability. Top Lang Disord 2000; 20:37‑49.