Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
2 Department of Microbiology, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom,
3 Department of Disaster and Emergency Health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Background: On account of the prevalence of psychoactive substances and drug abuse
and its diversity of forms and methods of use, along with the reduction in the age of
drug abuse, a continuing medical educationof physicians with these issues is necessary.
Although it is legally forbidden, most physicians have no close contact to these drugs,
and this is not effective for training, prevention and treatment of drug addiction. In this
regard, offering an educational tool is needed, if in close contact to these drugs. The ‘Nejat
Briefcase’ is a tool designed for the purpose of training and familiarization of psychoactive
substances and drugs. The aim of this study is to investigate the points of view of the
participants in the continuing medical education program, ‘Introduction to types of
psychoactive substances and drugs’ and about the Nejat Briefcase, in the Isfahan University
of Medical Sciences (IUMS). Materials and Methods: In this descriptive, cross‑sectional
study, all the general physicians (108 people) who participated in the continuing medical
education program, ‘Introducing types of psychoactive substances and drugs,’ in the
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), in 2012 – 2013, were considered. In this
program, in order to introduce various types of psychoactive substances and drugs to
the physicians, as well as acquaint them with their forms, methods of use, and prices,
the new educational tool (Nejat Briefcase), containing various types of psychoactive
substances and drugs and the related educational packages, such as, booklets and
brochures, was used. A researcher‑made, valid and reliable questionnaire was distributed
at the end of program to gather the participants’ points of view about the educational
program. Data was analyzed by the SPSS and t‑test and descriptive statistical tests.
Results and Discussion: The response rate to the questionnaire was 83%. Forty‑four
people (41%) were women and 64 (59%) were men. The mean total score of the participants’
points of view was 4/58 ± 0/45 (out of 5), which indicated the positive points of view of the
participants. Ninety‑seven people (90%) were satisfied with the program. Conclusions: On
account of the participants’ positive points of view on the Nejat Briefcase and their consent
to it, using varied and attractive educational tools for psychoactive substances and drug
training and producing tools similar to the
Nejat Briefcase are proposed.
Keywords
Education: Pakistan, a Developing Country’s Perspective. Am J
Med Qual 2013;28:175.
2. Ross C, Richard L, Potvin L. One year outcome evaluation of an
alcohol and drug abuse prevention program in a Quebec high
school. Can J Public Health 1998; 89:166‑70.
3. Wyatt SA, Dekker MA. Improving physician and medical student
education in substance use disorders. J Am Osteopath Assoc
2007;107(Suppl 5):ES27‑38.
4. Polydorou S, Gunderson EW, Levin FR. Training Physicians to Treat
Substance Use Disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2008;10:399‑404.
5. Wenther CJ, Bethany S. Opinions and experiences of Indiana
pharmacists and student pharmacists: The need for addiction
and substance abuse education in the United States. Amsterdam,
Netherlands: Elsevier; 2012.
6. Abrams Weintraub T, Saitz R, Samet JH. Education of preventive
medicine residents: Alcohol, tobacco, and other drug abuse. Am
J Prev Med 2003;24:101‑5.
7. Reeves TC. The impact of Media and Technology in Schools.
Available from: http://treeves.coe.uga.edu/Bertlesmann_Impact_
Report.pdf. [Last accessed on 2013 Mar 12].
8. Najafi M. Introducing educational package of safety an educational
tool to get familiar with drugs and drinks. Iran J Med Educ
2011;10:1310‑2.
9. Mollabashi R, Haghani F, Memarzadeh M. An Investigation on
Teachers Skills in Educational Clinics (Ambulatory Setting) in
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Babol University
of Medical Sciences 2010;12:26‑33.
10. Bordage G, Carlin B, Mazmanian PE; American College
of Chest Physicians Health and Science Policy Committee.
Continuing medical education effect on physician knowledge:
Effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College
of Chest Physicians Evidence‑Based Educational Guidelines. Chest
2009;135 (3 Suppl):29S‑36.
11. Bahador H, Pazooki A, Kabir A. Effectiveness of continuing medical
education considering participant’s idea in Iran University. J Pak
Med Assoc 2010;60:435‑9.
12. McGaghie WC, Siddall VJ, Mazmanian PE, Myers J; American
College of Chest Physicians Health and Science Policy Committee.
Lessons for continuing medical education from simulation research
in undergraduate and graduate medical education: Effectiveness of
continuing American College of Chest Physicians Evidence‑Based
Educational Guidelines. Chest 2009;135 (3 Suppl):62S‑8.
13. Telner D, Bujas‑Bobanovic M, Chan D, Chester B, Marlow B,
Meuser J, et al. Game‑based versus traditional case‑based learning:
Comparing effectiveness in stroke continuing medical education.
Can Fam Physician 2010;56:e345‑51.
14. Rastegar DA, Fingerhood MI, Jasinski DR. A resident clerkship that
combines inpatient and outpatient training in substance abuse and
HIV care. Subst Abus 2004;25:11‑5.
15. Daruosh Jalali. Efficiency of Preventing Short Message Service
on Students Attitudes and Self‑Efficiency towards Drug Abuse.
Communication Technology in Educational Sciences. Information and
Communication Technology In Educational Sciences 2011;1:93‑111.
16. Barron R, Frank E, Gitlow S. Evaluation of an experiential curriculum
for addiction education among medical students. J Addict Med
2012;6:131‑6.
)