1. Issued by Office of Science and technology Policy with a request for
public Comment.Proposed federal policy on misconduct to protect
the integrity of the research record. Fed Regist 1999;64:55722-5.
2. Office of Research integrity USPHS. Institutions elaborate PHS
definition of Misconduct. ORI News Lett 1995;3:5.
3. Office of research integrity. ORI provides working definition of
plagiarism. ORT News Lett 1994;3:5.
4. Committee on publication Ethics. Guidelines on good publication
and practice. 2009. Available from: http://publicationethics.org/
code-conduct [Last accessed on 2013 Nov 15].
5. Glick M.Plagiarism, Salami, Ghostwriting and other form of Flattery.
J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:140, 142, 144.
6. Eysenbach G. Report of a case of cyberplagiarism and reflections on
detecting and preventing academic misconduct using the internet.
Journal of medical internet Research;:2000(Mar31);2:e4.
7. Schrader ES.Perils and pitfalls of plagiarism and how to avoid them.
AORN J 1980;31:981-2.
8. Armstrong JD 2nd.Plagiarism: What is it, whom does it offend, and
how does one deal with it?” AJR Am J Roentgenol1993;161:479-84.
9. DeMaria AN. Duplicate publication: Insights into the essence of a
medical journal. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:516-7.
10. International committee of medical journal Editors. Uniform
requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical Journals,
2008. Available from: http://www.icmje.org. [Last accessed on
2013 Nov 15].
11. Jeffeson T. Redundant publication in biomedical sciences: Scientific
misconduct or necessity?Sci Eng Ethics 1998;4:135-40.
12. World association of Medical Editors. Duplicate publication.
[Online], 2005. Available from: http://www.Wame.org/
wame-listserve-discussion/duplicate-publication. [Last accessed
on 2013 Nov 15].
13. Rooney JJ, VandenHeuvel LN. Root cause analysis for beginners.
Qual Prog 2004;37:45-53.
14. Hegyvary ST. What Every Author Should Know About Redundant
and Duplicate Publication. JNurs Sch 2005;37:295-7.
15. von Elm E, Poglia G, Walder B, Tramèr MR.Different patterns of
duplicate publicationan analysis of articles used in systematic
reviews. JAMA 2004;291:974-80.
Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: N