Journal of Education and Health Promotion

Analysis of the quality of hospital information systems in Isfahan teaching hospitals based on the DeLone and McLean model

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

. Sakineh Saghaeiannejad-Isfahani
. Saeed Saeedbakhsh 1
. Maryam Jahanbakhsh 1
. Mahboobeh Habibi 2

1 Health Information Technology Research Center

2 Department of Health Information Management, School of Management and Medical Information, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract
Background: Quality is one of the most important criteria for the success of an information
system, which refers to its desirable features of the processing system itself. The aim of this
study was the analysis of system quality of hospital information systems (HIS) in teaching
hospitals of Isfahan based on the DeLone and McLean model. Materials and Methods: This
research was an applied and analytical‑descriptive study. It was performed in teaching hospitals
of Isfahan in 2010. The research population consisted of the HIS’s users, system designers and
hospital information technology (IT) authorities who were selected by random sampling method
from users’ group (n = 228), and system designers and IT authorities (n = 52) using census
method. The data collection tool was two researcher‑designed questionnaires. Questionnaires’
reliability was estimated by using Cronbach’s alpha was calculated. It was 97.1% for the
system designers and IT authorities’ questionnaire and 92.3% for system users’ questionnaire.
Results: Findings showed that the mean of system quality score in a variety of HIS and among
different hospitals was significantly different and not the same (P value ≥ 0.05). In general,
Kosar (new version) system and Rahavard Rayaneh system have dedicated the highest and
the lowest mean scores to themselves. The system quality criterion overall mean was 59.6%
for different HIS and 57.5% among different hospitals respectively. Conclusion: According to
the results of the research, it can be stated that based on the applied model, the investigated
systems were relatively desirable in terms of quality. Thus, in order to achieve a good optimal
condition, it is necessary to pay particular attention to the improving factors of system quality,
type of activity, type of specialty and hospital ownership type.

Keywords

Assessment
hospital information system
system quality
the DeLone and McLean model
1. Kashan University of Medical Sciences. Hospital information system,
1387. Available from: http://www.beheshti.kaums.ac.ir. [Last
accessed 2010 Jul 17]. [In Persian].
2. Matshidze P, Hanmer L. Health information systems in the private,2004. Available from: http://www.hst.org.za. [Last accessed
2009 Jul 18].
3. The White Paper on China’s Hospital Information Systems. China
Hospital Information Management Association (CHIMA), 2008.
Available from: http://www.chima.org.cn/pe/DataCenter. [Last
accessed 2009 Sep 25].
4. Chuck W. Leader. Management: Planning and Decision Making.
4th ed. Washington DC: Thompson Pub; 2006. p. 57.
5. Littlejohns P, Wyatt JC, Garvican L. Evaluating computerised
health information systems: Hard lessons still to be learnt. BMJ
2003;326:860‑3.
6. Islam M. Health Systems Assessment Approach: A How‑To Manual.
2007. p. 32. Availablefrom: http://www.healthsystems2020.org/
files/570_file_00_Introduction.pdf. [Last accessed 2010 Aug 19].
7. Research Development and Engineering Company in East Azarbaijan
Province. Effectiveness of management information systems [MIS],
2008. Available from: http://www.ict.moe.org.ir/_ICT/documents/
modiriyat‑ict/12.pdf. [Last accessed 2010 Dec 15]. [In Persian].
8. Torabi M, Safdari R, Shahmoradi L. Management of health
information technology. Tehran: Jafari; 2011. p. 152. [In Persian].
9. Assessment. Dictionary Merriam‑Webster, 2005. Available from:
http://www.merriam‑webster.com. [Last accessed 2010 May 02].
10. Pérez BE.Managment Information Systems. Validity of Delone
and Mclean’s Model of Information Systems Success at the
Web Site Level of Analysis [Dissertation]. USA: The Louisiana
State University; 2010. p. 69. Available from: http://www.etd.lsu.
edu. [Last accessed 2009 May 07].
11. Roldán J, Leal A. A validation test of an adaptation of the Delone
and Mclean’s Model in the Spanish EIS Field, 2003. Available
from: http://www.citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc. [Last accessed
2010 Jul 03].
12. Delone WI, Mclean EP. Information systems success: The quest
for the dependent variable, 1992. Available from: http://www.unc.
edu/~kome/inls201/deloneInformationSystemsSuccess.pdf. [Last
accessed 2010 Jul 24].
13. Mahdavi A. Proposed system for evaluation of quality information
systems [Thesis]. Tehran: Management University; 2003. [In
persian].
14. Khalesi N, Ahmadi M, Ayatollahi H. A study on the attitudes of
users about application of admission discharge system‑9 (ADS‑9)
software. JHM 2003;6:47‑53. [In Persian].
15. Ahmadi M, Rezaei P. Electronic health records: The structure, content
and assessment. Tehran: Jafari Publications; 2008. p. 169. [In Persian].
16. Molla A, Licker P. E‑commerce systems success: An attempt to
extend and respecify the Delone and Maclean model of is success.
JECR 2001;2:21.
17. Gebauer J, Schober F. Information system flexibility and the
performance of business processes (JAIS) 2005;5:79.
18. Gebauer J, Lee F. Enterprise system flexibility and implementation
strategies: Aligning theory with evidence from a case study, 2007.
Available from: http://www.business.uiuc.edu/. [Last accessed
2009.jul 28].
19. Response time, 2006. Available from: http://www.search
networking. Techtarget.com. [Last accessed 2011 Oct 11].
20. Nakhoda M, Aran N. Tndamvz concepts of computer networks.
Electronic J 2002.34;4:65.
21. Ahmadi M, Shahmoradi L, Barabadi M, Hoseini F. Usability
evaluation of hospital information systems based on isometric 9241.
Hakim Res J 2011;13:226‑33. [In Persian].
22. Singh K. Challenges in implementing a hospital information system,
2008. Available from: http://www.ehealthonline.org/articles. [Last
accessed 2011 May 09].
23. Csiki I, Marcu A, Ungurean C. Health Informations. 231. Description
of the National Health Information System in Romania. Bucharest:
WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2005. p. 6-17.
24. Wangpipatwong S, Chutimaskul W, Papasratorn. Factors influencing
the adoption of Thaie Government websites: Information quality
and system quality approach. Proceeding of the fourth International
Conference on eBusiness. Bangkok, Thailand; November 19‑20, 2005.
25. Ahmadi M, Hosseini F, Barabadi M. A survey on the compatibility
of the Hospital Information Systems (HIS) with the needs of
medical records users from the system. J Health Administration
2008;11:27‑38. [In persian].
26. Ribiere V, LaSalle A, Khorramshahgol R, Gousty Y. Hospital
information systems quality: A customer satisfaction assessment
tool. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference
on System Sciences.; 1999.
27. Mohsenzadeh. Software quality, 2007. Available from: http://www.
gilrec.co.ir/. [Last accessed 2012 Jul 13].
28. Hanmer L. Health Information Sytem. 54. Assessment of Success
of a Computerised Hospital Information System in a Public Sector
Hospital in South Africa. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2004. p. 136.
Journal of Education and Health Promotion
Volume 5, Issue 1
Winter 2015
Pages 1-6

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us