Authors
1 Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Shiraz Univer
2 Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, and Emam sajad Hospital, Cnical Reseach Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
3 Clinical Education Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz,
4 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Teaching of clinical pathology to medical students has been ignored in many countries
such as Iran. We aim to introduce a practical brief course and its proper timing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three groups of medical students from consecutive years of entrance
passed a 1.5 working day practical course on the field. Their level of knowledge was assessed by
pre‑ and post‑tests. Their idea and satisfaction were gathered by questionnaires.
RESULTS: Knowledge of students became significantly higher after the course. Their satisfaction
was high. Students in later year of education got significantly higher marks. Most of the students
wished such a course should be away from basic sciences period and as near as possible to
internship.
DISCUSSION: Due to overloaded curriculum of general medicine in Iran, we decided to run a brief
practical course of laboratory medicine education for medical students. Although the course was
practical, the knowledge of students became higher. Students with more clinical experience and
knowledge absorbed more. Being actively involved in the classes lit the enthusiasm of students and
made them satisfied with the course. It seemed that the course should be placed in later years of
clinical training to get the best uptake and results.
Keywords
in Laboratory Sciences – A White Paper, Atlanta, Quality Institute
Conference; 13‑15 April, 2003. p. 1‑23.
2. Wolcott J, Schwartz A, Goodman C. Laboratory Medicine:
A National Status Report. Columbus, OH: Battelle Memorial
Institute; May, 2008. Available from: https://www.
futurelabmedicine.org/pdfs/2007%20status%20report%20
laboratory_medicine_‑_a_national_status_report_from_the_
lewin_group.pdf. [Last accessed on 2011 Nov 21].
3. Molinaro RJ, Winkler AM, Kraft CS, Fantz CR, Stowell SR,
Ritchie JC, et al. Teaching laboratory medicine to medical
students: Implementation and evaluation. Arch Pathol Lab Med
2012;136:1423‑9.
4. Wilson ML. Educating medical students in laboratory medicine.
Am J Clin Pathol 2010;133:525‑8.
5. Abdollahi A, Jalali Nadoushan MR. Little attention paid to
laboratory medicine in medical school curriculum. Iran J Pathol
2011;6:1‑2.
6. OsmanM, AdnanA, Kannan KuttyM, Al‑NaggarA. R. Evaluation
of laboratory medicine teaching and learning by medical students
in hybrid integrated curriculum. Data from public Malaysian
university. J Basic Appl Sci Res 2014;4:151‑7.
7. Bligh D. What’s the point in discussion? Exeter, England: Intellect
Books; 2000.
8. Saxena A, Nesbitt R, Pahwa P, Mills S. Crossword puzzles: Active
learning in undergraduate pathology and medical education.
Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009;133:1457‑62.
9. Bransford J, Brown A, Cocking R, editors. How People Learn:
Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National
Research Council, National Academy Press; 2000.
10. Smith BR, Aguero‑Rosenfeld M, Anastasi J, Baron B, Berg A,
Bock JL, et al. Educating medical students in laboratory medicine:
A proposed curriculum. Am J Clin Pathol 2010;133:533‑42.
11. Green ML, Ciampi MA, Ellis PJ. Residents’ medical information
needs in clinic: Are they being met? Am J Med 2000;109:218‑23.
12. van Walraven C, Naylor CD. Do we know what inappropriate
laboratory utilization is? A systematic review of laboratory clinical
audits. JAMA 1998;280:550‑8.
13. Gottfried EL, Kamoun M, Burke MD. Laboratory medicine
education in United States medical schools. Am J Clin Pathol
1993;100:594‑8.
14. Marshall R, Cartwright N, Mattick K. Teaching and learning
pathology: A critical review of the English literature. Med Educ
2004;38:302‑13
)