Authors
1 Department of Health Information Management, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Department of Medical Library and Information Sciences, School of Management and Medical Information
2 Department of Health Management, Effective Social Factors in Health Research Center, Department of Medical Library and Information Sciences, School of Management and Medical Information Science, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran
3 Department of Medical Library and Information Sciences, School of Management and Medical Information
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As one of the indicators of actual growth and scientific development capacity of
countries, the importance of the research is steadily increasing. Knowing that success depends on
the work done by researchers so identified identify these barriers and pave the way for one of the
concerned authorities of their research.
METHODS: This qualitative study using analysis of the theme. Semi‑structured interviews were
used to collect the data. Participants include people who are experienced and knowledgeable in
the field. Sampling was purposeful and continued until data saturation. The criteria of “reliability”,
“trustworthiness”, “reliability” and “significant consolidation” of data were considered.
RESULTS: Data analysis led to the extraction of code 600, 5, and 35 issues were Zyrmvzv. Five topics
including motivation, success factors, barriers and problems, reflections and strategies, respectively.
Conclusion: Discussion interest, innovation, the ability to apply research methods, specializes in
the research literature and English language skills of researchers successfully in printing paper.
Creating strong incentives to improve the material and spiritual encouragement and removal of
obstacles, increase the amount of scientific publications and its opposite, although the force can cause
increased production of scientific publications, but the negative consequences of such unhealthy
competition and robbery also will follow. As a result, universities have to go through proper planning
and management in the areas of research and teaching more responsible to pay it.
Keywords
Kermanshah Medical Sciences University (1381-1372). Tehran:
Azad University; 2003.
2. Nouri R, Danesh F. Scientific production of academic members
in web of sciences during 2000-2005 and effective factor: A case
study in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Scientometrics
2008;70:33-41.
3. Zahed Zahedani M. Faculty members and scientific production:
Quantitative Study in 1369-1378. Shiraz: Shiraz University; 2000.
4. Kianpour M, Bahmanziari P, Arti S, Naji H. Survey of research
problems from the viewpoints of managers, scientific staffs and
research experts in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Res
Nurs Midwifery 2005;28:11-23.
5. Keyvanara M, Ojaghi R, Sohrabi MC, Papi A. Experiences of
experts about the instances of plagiarism. J Educ Health Promot
2013;2:32.
6. Alizadeh Aghdam M, Abbaszadeh M, Shishavani A. Evaluation
of adherence to scientific ethics among faculty members; the case
of Tabriz university. Sci Technol Policy 2011;3:57-69.
7. Fazloullahi S. Identification and classification of science
production' obstacles from the perspective of faculty members
of Qom University. Marifat 2011;3:108-24.
8. Darabi Sh, Kohpai A, Yousofi M, Komeyli Movahed T,
Ahmari Tehran H, Rahmani M. Severity evaluate of problems
befor and after administrative and management interventions in
point of faculty members and researchers Qom Medical Sciences
University in 1388-1383. Qom Univ Med Sci J 2009;3:37-44.
9. Shomoosi N, Kooshan M. Success in geting articles published by
iranian medical research: The role of english language. Middle
East J Sci Res 2011;7:694-89.
10. Bonaccorsi A, Daraio C. Age effect in scientific productivity:
The case of the Italian National Research Council (CNR).
Scientometrics 2003;58:49-90.
11. Funk SG, Tornquist EM, Champagne MT. Barriers and facilitators
of research utilization. An integrative review. Nurs Clin North
Am 1995;30:395-407.
12. Zohor A, Fekri A. The research barriers from viewpoint of
faculty members of Medical science University of Iran. Payesh
2003;2:119-29.
13. Ghamsari FT. Jahan nama M. Review of the researcher's scientific
production status of engineering research center in 1370-1384.
Libr Inf Sci 2008;10:107-24.
14. Nouri R, Danesh F. Scientific production of academic members in
web of sciences during 2000-2005 and effective factor in Isfahan
University of medical sciences. J Sci Commun 2008;17:1-4.
15. Weisinger JR, Bellorín-Font E. Latin American nephrology:Scientific production and impact of the publications. Kidney Int
1999;56:1584-90.
16. Koorki M, Mahjub H, Sheikh N. Study of the academic members
attitude about main factors of not approaching to scientific writing
in Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Med Educ
2007;4:63-59.
17. Sereshti M, Kazemian A, Daris F. Research barriers from the
viewpoint of faculty members and employees of Shahrekord
University of Medical Sciences. Iran J Educ Strateg 2010;3:51-7.
18. Rowland I. Journals and Scientific Productivity. London:
Publishing Research Consortium; 2006. p. 1-16.
19. Chen Y, Nixon M, Gupta A, Hoshower L. Research productivity
of accounting faculty: An exploratory study. Am J Bus Educ
2010;3:101-15.
20. Hardre P, Beesley A, Miller R, Pace T. Faculty motivation to do
research: Across disciplines in research extensive universities.
J Professoriate 2011;5:35-69.
21. Wichian S, Wongwonich S, Bowarnkitiwoang S. Factors affecting
research productivity of faculty memberes in government
universities: Lisrel and nevral network analyses. Kasetsart J
2009;30:67-78.
22. Abbaspour H. Review of production information by faculty
members of Medical Sciences in 79-1375. Tehran: Tarbiat
Modarres University; 2002.
23. Ferrándiz E. Does Inter-regional Scientific Collaboration in
Academic Research Affect the Quality of the Scientific Production?
Dime-druid Academy Winter Conference 2011, University of
Cadiz; 2011.
)