<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName></PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Education and Health Promotion</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2277-9531</Issn>
				<Volume>13</Volume>
				<Issue>1</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2023</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Prevalence and predictors of vaccine hesitancy among mothers of under‑five children: A hospital‑based cross‑sectional study</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>9</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">28290</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Narayana Goruntla</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-2014-5357</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kokkala Akanksha</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department
of Pharmacy Practice,
Raghavendra Institute of
Pharmaceutical Education
and Research (RIPER) ‑
Autonomous, Anantapur,
Andhra Pradesh, India</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Katta Lalithaasudhaa</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department
of Pharmacy Practice,
Raghavendra Institute of
Pharmaceutical Education
and Research (RIPER) ‑
Autonomous, Anantapur,
Andhra Pradesh, India</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Vikash Pinnu</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department
of Pharmacy Practice,
Raghavendra Institute of
Pharmaceutical Education
and Research (RIPER) ‑
Autonomous, Anantapur,
Andhra Pradesh, India</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Dasaratharamaiah Jinka</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Pediatrics,
Rural Development Trust
Hospital, Bathalapalli,
Andhra Pradesh,
India</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Pradeepkumar Bhupalam</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department
of Pharmacology,
Raghavendra Institute of
Pharmaceutical Education
and Research (RIPER) ‑
Autonomous, Anantapur,
Andhra Pradesh,
India</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jyosna Doniparthi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of
Pharmaceutics, Sri
Krishnadevaraya University
College of Pharmaceutical
Sciences, S.K. University,
Anantapuramu,
Andhra Pradesh, India</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2023</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) states that vaccine hesitancy is one of&lt;br /&gt;the top 10 threats to global public health. Evidence shows that vaccine hesitancy studies in India&lt;br /&gt;are limited and targeted toward individual vaccines. The study aimed to fill this gap by exploring the&lt;br /&gt;relationship between demographics and SAGE factors toward vaccine hesitancy.&lt;br /&gt;MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hospital‑based, cross‑sectional, analytical study was conducted&lt;br /&gt;in a non‑governmental organization (NGO) hospital with 330 beds, located in Bathalapalli,&lt;br /&gt;Andhra Pradesh, India. Mothers of under‑five children who attended outpatient departments of&lt;br /&gt;pediatrics or obstetrics and gynecology were included. A total of 574 mothers were enrolled and&lt;br /&gt;vaccine hesitancy was determined by reviewing the mother–child protection card for the presence&lt;br /&gt;of delay or refusal of the recommended vaccine. A face‑to‑face interview was conducted to obtain&lt;br /&gt;demographics and WHO–SAGE variables from the participants. Binary logistic regression analysis&lt;br /&gt;was performed to associate independent variables (demographics and SAGE variables) with the&lt;br /&gt;dependent variable (vaccine hesitancy).&lt;br /&gt;RESULTS: Out of 574 respondents, 161 mother’s children were noted as vaccine‑hesitant (refusal = 7;&lt;br /&gt;delay = 154); and the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was 28.05%. The delay was observed in all&lt;br /&gt;recommended vaccines, but the refusal or reluctance was seen in only four vaccines (hepatitis B&lt;br /&gt;birth dose = 1; IPV 1 and 2 = 2; Measles 1 and 2 = 3; and Rota 1, 2, and 3 = 1). The respondents’&lt;br /&gt;demographics like no or lower parent education (OR = 3.17; 95%CI = 1.50–6.72) and fewer antenatal&lt;br /&gt;visits (OR = 2.30; 95%CI = 1.45–3.36) showed higher odds, whereas the upper socioeconomic&lt;br /&gt;status showed lower odds (OR = 0.09; 95%CI = 0.02–0.36) toward vaccine hesitancy. The WHO–&lt;br /&gt;SAGE dimensions like awareness (OR = 0.14; 95%CI = 0.03–0.53), poor access (OR = 7.76;&lt;br /&gt;95%CI = 3.65–16.51), and low acceptability of the individual (OR = 07.15; 95%CI = 1.87–27.29),&lt;br /&gt;community (OR = 6.21; 95%CI = 1.58–24.33) were significantly associated with vaccine hesitancy.&lt;br /&gt;CONCLUSION: The study concludes that the prevalence of vaccine hesitancy was high. Vaccine&lt;br /&gt;safety and children’s health are primary concerns for parents’ refusal/reluctance. To achieve 100%&lt;br /&gt;immunization coverage, policymakers need to reduce vaccine hesitancy by developing strategies&lt;br /&gt;based on demographic and WHO–SAGE working group predictors.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Childhood vaccination</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">immunization coverage</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">vaccine delay</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">vaccine hesitancy</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jehp.mui.ac.ir/article_28290_6ab025df5539049ffad9e5f29eab084b.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
