Keywords = Educational assessment
Number of Articles: 2
The feasibility of simulation‑based high‑stakes assessment in emergency medicine settings: A scoping review

The feasibility of simulation‑based high‑stakes assessment in emergency medicine settings: A scoping review

Volume 11, Issue 10, November 2021, Pages 1-9

. Loui K. Alsulimani

Abstract Using simulation in high‑stakes assessments has been evolving as a method to improve the
assessment process. There is a concurrent need to address challenges and establish best practices
to ensure the best quality when implementing high‑stakes evaluations. The aim of this study is to
provide an insight for stakeholders about using multiple modalities of simulation in high‑stakes
evaluations by presenting challenges, best practices, and future directions described in the relevant
literature.A scoping review of original studies (from the year 1994–2021) including the use of common
modalities (standardized patients, high‑fidelity mannequins, part‑task trainers, virtual simulation, and
hybrid simulation) was conducted. The search covered the common databases: PubMed, Education
Resource Information Center, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the
Cochrane library.Initial screening in the databases resulted in 111,253 articles. After the application
of a refining search strategy, 47 articles were included for comprehensive evaluation. Most articles
were about credentialing/licensure purposes of assessment. Many articles were specialty‑specific,
especially focusing on anesthesia. Most challenges described were related to the validity of the
assessment that should be considered in the planning phase. Best practices were mostly related
to planning for measures to assure the validity of the assessment tools and process.The use of
multimodality simulation for high‑stakes assessment is growing despite challenges; this growth is
associated with the accumulation of experience shared in literature. This growth will help to improve
planning, practices, and goals achievement from such an application.

A modified tool for “reflective practice” in medical education: Adaptation of the REFLECT rubric in Persian

A modified tool for “reflective practice” in medical education: Adaptation of the REFLECT rubric in Persian

Volume 10, Issue 1, January 2020, Pages 1-7

. Saeideh Daryazadeh, . Nikoo Yamani, . Payman Adibi

Abstract CONTEXT: Reflection is a learnable process that enhances long‑life learning, clinical decision‑making,
and can foster empathy and professionalism. One of the methods for teaching reflection is “reflective
writing” that is conducted in “reflective practice.” Some tools have been developed to assess “reflective
capacity,” and The Reflection Evaluation for Learners’ Enhanced Competencies Tool (REFLECT)
is one of them.
AIMS: This study aimed to adapt the REFLECT rubric in Persian.
SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This quantitative study was conducted in a medical school with the
participation of medical interns through census sampling, and in three stages, including translation,
pilot study, and main study.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Persian translation was obtained by the “forward/backward translation”
method. We made some changes in the tool and used it in the pilot and main study to confirm validity
and reliability.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, Pearson correlation, and Cohen’s
kappa were applied for statistical analysis. Data analysis was performed using SPSS23.
RESULTS: We inserted a numerical value of 1–4 at the reflection levels, and also removed Axis 2 and
an optional writing component. In the pilot study, face and content validity was confirmed involving
10 interns and five medical education specialists. Then, 67 interns participated in the main study,
and we measured the reliability of the tool by internal consistency through Cronbach’s alpha (0.83)
and test‑retest through correlation coefficient (0.89). The size of the agreement was measured to
determine the inter‑rater reliability by Cohen’s kappa (0.84).
CONCLUSIONS: The modified REFLECT version is a valid and reliable tool that can help us to
assess reflective capacity. The use of this tool is recommended for reflective practice in medicine.